检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林晚发[1,2] 钟辉勇 赵仲匡 宋敏 LIN Wanfa;ZHONG Huiyong;ZHAO Zhongkuang;SONG Min(School of Economics and Management,Wuhan University;School of Finance,Shanghai University of International Business and Economics)
机构地区:[1]武汉大学经济与管理学院,湖北武汉430072 [2]上海对外经贸大学金融学院,上海201620
出 处:《金融研究》2022年第4期77-96,共20页Journal of Financial Research
基 金:国家自然科学基金青年项目(71602148、71802152);教育部人文社科青年基金项目(18YJC630109);上海交通大学现代金融研究基金的资助。
摘 要:目前已有研究认为金融中介机构竞争会带来市场效率的提高,本文利用2012-2017年债券市场的微观数据研究“发行人付费”模式评级机构之间的竞争对评级结果的影响。研究发现,评级机构竞争会导致评级结果膨胀与评级质量下降。进一步研究发现,当评级竞争加剧时,“发行人付费”模式的评级机构会对有较多业务联系的企业放松评级标准,给予更高信用评级。我们的研究也发现评级机构的外资背景、承销商的良好声誉和媒体关注均有助于减小“发行人付费”模式下评级机构竞争的负面影响。同时,债券市场评级竞争还存在对股票市场的溢出效应,评级竞争导致的评级质量下降也降低了股票市场的信息效率。这说明,“发行人付费”模式下的评级机构竞争会降低资本市场的信息效率,“投资者付费”模式的推广和评级行业的对外开放有助于改善国内评级行业的评级质量。本文的研究也为国内债券市场进一步发挥双评级、多评级以及不同模式评级的交叉验证作用提供了一定证据支持。The rate of defaults in China's bond market has rapidly increased.However,the ratings allocated to bonds by credit rating agencies(CRAs)have not keep pace with this increase and have thus failed to efficiently reflect changes in corporate default risk.Some CRAs have even awarded overly high ratings to deliberately mislead investors,which has intensified doubts about these CRAs'independence.Improving the independence,authenticity and international recognition of China's domestic CRAs has thus become an urgent problem for the country's bond market.As of July 2021,14 CRAs in China's bond market have obtained regulatory rating certification:four investor-paid CRAs and 10 issuer-paid CRAs.These CRAs are locked in fierce competition for ratings business.Since 2017,the People's Bank of China and the China Securities Regulatory Commission have promoted the gradual opening-up of the credit rating industry,allowing overseas CRAs to apply for domestic rating business.As this will further intensify competition in the domestic rating industry in the future,this is an important area of study.In theory,the intensification of competition between financial intermediaries should improve their internal management efficiency and reputation,thus reducing moral hazard.This is supported by empirical studies on the banking industry that show competition reduces moral hazard and risk-taking behavior,and thus improves credit quality and efficiency.As CRAs are the most important intermediary in the bond market,it is worth exploring whether the intensification of competition between them will also have a positive impact on the reliability of the credit ratings they issue.On the one hand,from a reputational perspective,the intensification of competition between CRAs could increase their level of attention to their reputations and thus increase the quality of their internal control,thereby reducing the level of moral hazard behavior and in turn improving the quality of the ratings they issue.On the other hand,unlike in the banking industry,CR
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49