检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:YANG Xue-le ZHANG Lu WANG Su-hua HE Lu-qiu 杨学乐;张璐;王素华;何录秋(湖南省作物研究所,湖南长沙410125)
机构地区:[1]Hunan Crops Research Institute,Changsha 410125,PRC
出 处:《Agricultural Science & Technology》2022年第1期6-10,共5页农业科学与技术(英文版)
基 金:Supported by Hunan Dry Grain Industry Technology System Project (Xiangnongfa [2019]105);Hunan Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Fund Project (2021CX22)。
摘 要:In order to find the best intercropping pattern of fresh maize and mung bean, five planting patterns, namely fresh maize monocropping, mung bean monocropping, fresh maize and mung bean intercropping at row ratios of 2∶4, 3∶3 and 4∶2 were set up, and the yields and economic benefits of these planting patterns were analyzed. The results showed that the LERs of the three intercropping patterns were all above 1, and the economic benefits of 2∶4, 3∶3 and 4∶2 fresh maize and mung bean intercropping patterns were seen an increase of 2.85%, 17.64% and 14.26% respectively compared with fresh maize monocropping and an increase of 52.06%, 73.92% and 68.93% respectively compared with mung bean monocropping.Among the three intercropping patterns, the intercropping pattern with row ratio 3∶3showed the best effect, which also derived the highest LER with greatest economic benefit.为探明鲜食玉米与绿豆最佳间作模式,设置玉米单作、绿豆单作、玉米和绿豆2∶4间作、3∶3间作、4∶2间作等5种种植模式,分析不同种植模式对作物产量及经济效益的影响。结果表明:玉米与绿豆有明显的间作优势,3种间作模式的LER均大于1,玉米与绿豆3种间作模式较玉米单作分别增效2.85%、18.13%和14.26%,较绿豆单作分别增效52.06%、74.66%和68.93%。综合来看,玉米与绿豆3:3间作的种植模式在LER、经济效益等方面为最优。
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249