检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:袁帆 YUAN Fan(Shanghai Polytechnic University,Shanghai 201209)
机构地区:[1]上海第二工业大学图书馆(档案馆),上海201209
出 处:《农业图书情报学报》2022年第5期76-91,共16页Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture
基 金:国家社科基金项目“基于用户交互的网络社区知识聚合组织和服务研究”(16BTQ072)。
摘 要:[目的/意义]社交网络逐渐融入到用户生产、生活各方面的同时也造成了数据垄断、数字经济活力下降等问题,构建面向社交网络用户的个人数据转移机制,打破数据垄断,保障用户数字权益,促进数字创新。[方法/过程]对国外优秀的数据转移制度、实践模式以及经典案例进行调研与国际比较研究,分析了数据转移机制实践的效用与问题。[结果/结论]设计了包含信任机制、反馈机制、评估机制、删除机制与监管机制的全流程数据转移管理组织架构以及数据获取、转移路径,打破了大型社交网络平台对用户个人数据的垄断态势。[Purpose/Significance]As a typical pattern of user-centered information service,social network has become increasingly pervasive throughout every aspect of users'lives,whereas resulting in some safety problems,for instance data abuse and data monopoly.Users'power of control over personal data has been weakened.The digital market has witnessed the incidence of restrained competition and suppressed innovation,which leads to the impaired vitality of the national digital economy.Nationally,much more attention has been drawn to the protection of users'data rights and interests.Likewise,with the advancement of information technology,it is possible to transfer users'data across platforms.However,the absence of management mechanism makes it impossible to bridge the gap of users'cross platform access,acquisition and transfer of personal data.Hence,on the basis of the investigation and analysis of international successful data transfer modes within the domestic digital network environment,this research aims to construct a personal data transfer mechanism for social network users for breaking the data blockade and protect their digital rights and interests.[Method/Process]To provide the insights into existing research on management mechanism of user's personal data transfer,this research has investigated and reviewed systematically the data transfer systems at home and abroad represented by Data Portability,California Consumer Privacy Protection Law and Anti-Monopoly Law,in such a way that a horizontal comparison from the aspects of system characteristics and connotation,and an analysis of the effectiveness and existing problems of a data transfer system in protecting user's data rights and breaking data monopoly were conducted.Furthermore,according to the characteristics of social network platform,some representative cases like Facebook,SoLiD,and WeChat were chosen to investigate and analyze the mode,characteristics and impact of user's personal data transfer,and then ten mainstream social network platforms at home and abr
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.91