国际投资争端治理中国内法院的参与统筹与制度应对  

Discussion on the Participation of Domestic Courts and Its Legal Response in the Overall Governance of International Investment Disputes

作　　者：曹兴国[1] CAO Xingguo

机构地区：[1]大连海事大学法学院,辽宁大连116026

出　　处：《济南大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第3期156-164,190,共10页Journal of University of Jinan:Social Science Edition

基　　金：2021年辽宁省哲学社会科学青年人才培养对象委托课题“自由贸易港(区)航运深化创新的政策与法律保障研究”(项目编号:2022lslwkt-010)之阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：国内法院在国际投资争端治理中呈“回归”之势,但其需要在争端解决的政治与法律效果,对国际投资仲裁的监督与干预立场,以及争端预防新维度的开发等方面做好统筹。同时,国内法院的参与也面临政治化风险加剧、司法与仲裁的良性互动尚待形成、治理能力不足等挑战。基于我国海外投资利益的保护诉求相对更为紧迫的客观实际,应在投资协定层面对东道国司法救济的适用采取相对限制性的立场,并加强国内法院的参与能力和参与机制建设。同时,我国法院对国际投资仲裁的司法审查和程序介入制度应予完善,并在投资法律的适用与释明、争端风险信息收集与预警机制的构建上积极探索争端预防的功能建设。The restoring of domestic courts’governance in international investment disputes has received considerable attention,whose participation requires overall planning in the protection of investors’interests and the maintenance of the host country’s regulatory power,supervision and support of international investment arbitration,and the development of dispute prevention functions.At the same time,the participation of domestic courts also needs to face challenges such as increased politicization risks,a benign interaction between justice and arbitration yet to be formed,and insufficient governance capabilities.Based on the relatively more urgent need in the protection of Chinese overseas investment interests,a restrictive stance should be adopted for the participation of domestic courts in dispute settlement.Meanwhile,the judicial review and procedural intervention system of international investment arbitration by Chinese courts should be improved.The construction of dispute prevention functions should be actively explored in the application and interpretation of investment laws,and in the construction of dispute risk information collection and early warning mechanisms.

关 键 词：国际投资争端 涉外法治 争端解决 司法审查 争端预防 

分 类 号：D99[政治法律—国际法学]