检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王学典[1] Wang Xuedian
出 处:《国际儒学(中英文)》2022年第1期1-6,165,共7页International Studies on Confucianism
摘 要:《尚书》学由古而今,在学术和思想领域,经历了一个“化经为史”的“古今之变”,现代《尚书》学研究在这条路径上取得了丰硕的成果。在这一过程中,始终隐现着历史学与思想史研究两条道路的分歧。“化经为史”是以学科化知识的形态,以专业化的现代学术方式,过滤掉了经学所曾包含的、在中国古典社会绵延了数千年的传统伦理价值与信仰体系。在现代《尚书》学的构建过程中,在经学转化为史学的过程中,经典的注解和叙事被现代学术的学科研究形式所取代,传统价值伦理体系失去了文献依托,这一盲区使儒家思想的表达方式和传播途径面临着根本性的挑战。The studies of the Book of Documents(Shangshu尚书)has been developing from ancient times.It has experienced the changes from“classics to modern studies”that“turns classics into the study of history”.Modern research on the Book of Documents has achieved fruitful results.At the same time,in the process of“turning classics into the study of history”,there has always been a divergence between the two paths,namely the study of history,and the study of intellectual history.“Turning classics into the study of history”is a form of knowledge built up within a discipline.It is a specialized modern academic approach that filters out the traditional ethical values and belief systems that have been included in traditional Chinese society for thousands of years.In the process of constructing the modern studies on the Book of Documents,and in the process of transforming the study of classics into the study of history,disciplinary research in modern scholarship replaces classical annotations and narratives.This means that traditional value and ethical system lost the support of classical literature.Such a blind spot has made fundamental challenges for the expressing and disseminating of Confucianism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.143.213.242