检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱晓峰 蒋旭牧 Zhu Xiaofeng;Jiang Xumu(School of Economics and Management,Nanjing Tech University,Jiangsu,211816)
机构地区:[1]南京工业大学经济与管理学院,江苏211816
出 处:《情报资料工作》2022年第3期5-19,共15页Information and Documentation Services
基 金:国家社会科学基金“加快构建中国特色哲学社会科学学科体系、学术体系、话语体系”研究专项项目“新时代中国特色图书情报学基本理论问题研究”(项目编号:19VXK09)的研究成果之一。
摘 要:[目的/意义]在加快构建中国特色哲学社会科学话语体系的背景下,探究国际图书情报学科领域中国学者的学术话语权演变,有助于传播图书情报学科的学术话语,提升中国特色哲学社会科学的国际话语权。[方法/过程]首先,严格界定了中国学者的学术话语权;接着,从学术影响力、学术引领力、学术竞争力等方面分别剖析了国际图情领域中国学者的学术话语权演变趋势及演化路径;最后,总结分析了中国学者在图书情报领域的学术话语权特点。[结果/结论]研究表明:中国学者在国际图书情报领域的学术话语权影响力逐步扩大,最小努力运作机制是其演变的内驱力;学术话语权地位由滞后向引领演化,其规律呈现出典型的马太效应;学术话语权优势大并且优势积累的来源稳定,其演变契合信息偏好运作机制.[Purpose/significance]Under the background of accelerating the construction of a discourse system of Phi?losophy and Social Sciences with Chinese Characteristics,exploring the evolution of the academic discourse power of Chinese scholars in the field of international Information Science and Library Science discipline will help spread its ac?ademic discourse and enhance the international discourse power of Philosophy and Social Sciences with Chinese Char?acteristics.[Method/process]First,the academic discourse power of Chinese scholars was strictly defined.Then,the evolution trend and path of Chinese scholars’academic discourse power in the field of international Information Sci?ence and Library Science were respectively analyzed from the perspective of academic influence,academic leadership,and academic competitiveness.Finally,this paper summarized and analyzed the characteristics of academic discourse power of Chinese scholars in the field of international Information Science and Library Science.[Result/conclusion]The research shows that the influence of Chinese scholars'academic discourse power in the international Information Science and Library Science field is gradually expanding,and the minimum effort operating mechanism is the internal driving force for its evolution.The status of academic discourse power has evolved from lagging to leading,and its law shows a typical Matthew effect.The academic discourse power has a large advantage and the source of the advantage ac?cumulation is stable,and its evolution fits the information preference operating mechanism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3