检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:齐茵[1] Qi Yin(Jiangsu Open University,Nanjing,210036)
机构地区:[1]江苏开放大学,南京210036
出 处:《分子植物育种》2022年第6期1850-1855,共6页Molecular Plant Breeding
基 金:海南自贸港南繁科技城及国家南繁基地联合征文并由“新品种知识产权专项”(XPZIP20210014)资助。
摘 要:转基因农作物本身具有特殊性,它也决定了其相应监管法律的监管针对性,中美两国作为世界上转基因技术较为发达、转基因农作物生产种植与销售规模比较大的两个国家,他们所颁布的转基因农作物监管法律制度也具备一定代表性和权威性。针对转基因食品的大量依赖中国出台了大量转基因监管法规和标识制度,但就整体而言与美国还存在差异性。本研究首先阐述了美国转基因作物监管法律制度的关键内容,对中美两国的转基因作物监管法律制度差异内容进行研究对比,揭示中美两国在转基因作物监管法律制度上形成差异的主要成因。Genetically modified crops have their own partic ularity,which also determines the regulatory pertinence of their corresponding regulatory laws.As the two countries with the most developed genetically modified technology and the largest production,planting and sales scale of genetically modified crops in the world,the regulatory legal system of genetically modified crops promulgated by China and the United States also has a certain representativeness and authority.As far as China is concerned,the large dependence on genetically modified food has also led to the introduction of a large number of genetically modified regulatory regulations and labeling systems,but on the whole,there are differences with the United States.Therefore,this paper first expounds the key contents of the legal system of genetically modified crops regulation in the United States,and then studies and compares the differences between the legal systems of genetically modified crops regulation in China and the United States.Finally,it reveals the main reasons for the differences between China and the United States in the legal system of GM crop supervision.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38