检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Xiaojian Chen Wenrui Yao Feifei Gao Dingyuan Zheng Qiong Wang Jun Cao Haiyan Tan Yanhua Zhang
机构地区:[1]Engineering Research Center of Advanced Wooden Materials,Ministry of Education,Northeast Forestry University,Harbin,150040,China [2]Postdoctoral Research Station of Mechanical Engineering,Northeast Forestry University,Harbin,150040,China [3]Wenzhou Polytechnic,Wenzhou,325000,China
出 处:《Journal of Renewable Materials》2021年第5期979-992,共14页可再生材料杂志(英文)
基 金:This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.31670569);the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(No.2572019CG05);Special thanks to the support of the Chinese University Students,Innovation and Entrepreneurship Project(202010225071).
摘 要:The morphology and properties of corn starch and cassava starch were compared by SEM, DSC and TGA. Theeffects of amylose and amylopectin content on starch properties were studied by FT-IR, XRD and XPS. The plywood was pressed with the prepared adhesive and the bonding strength of the plywood was tested to analyze thedifference among the adhesives from different plant sources and the difference after blending PAPI prepolymer.FT-IR results showed that the hydroxyl peak of cassava starch was stronger and wider. TGA showed that the residue of cassava starch was lower, but the thermal stability of cassava starch was almost the same. XPS data showedthat the oxygen content of cassava starch was slightly higher, but the carbon content was slightly lower. SEM analysis showed that corn starch granules were more irregular and sharper than cassava starch, and cassava starchgranules were more uniform, regular and round.
关 键 词:Corn starch cassava starch comparative analysis ADHESIVE
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3