简论引渡中双重犯罪原则的适用与争议  

A Brief Discussion on the Application and Controversy of Principle of Double Criminality in Extradition

作　　者：李婉莹 LI Wan-ying(Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875)

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学法学院,北京100875

出　　处：《牡丹江教育学院学报》2022年第3期115-118,共4页Journal of Mudanjiang College of Education

摘　　要：双重犯罪原则是国际引渡工作进行的刚性原则之一,决定了引渡工作是否能够合理进行,但各国在其具体适用和审查上依然存在一定的问题和争议,尤其是国家之间刑事法律规定的不同、各国对“犯罪”和“刑罚”的界定标准不一、各国对于他国立法的态度等都会影响双重犯罪原则的实际审查工作,从而导致国际引渡工作无法顺利进行,这一定程度上属于不必要的司法资源浪费。为此可以针对一些适用上的争议和困境加以分析并提出一定的完善构想,诸如进一步完善立法,并在尊重他国立法和主权的同时,进一步加强对于双重犯罪原则的实质审查,回应争议的核心法律问题,提出完善的构想,更好地指导引渡工作的顺利进行。The principle of double criminality is one of the rigid principles in the conduct of international extradition work,but there are certain problems and disputes in its specific application,especially the differences in criminal laws between countries,and the different standards for the definition of"crime"and"penalty".The attitudes of various countries to the legislation of other countries will affect the actual review of principle of double criminality,which will result in the failure of international extradition work to proceed smoothly,which is an unnecessary waste of judicial resources to a certain extent.Thus,we can analyze some applicable disputes and dilemmas and put forward certain perfect ideas,such as further improving the legislation,and while respecting the legislation and sovereignty of other countries,further strengthening the substantive review of principle of double criminality,eventually guiding extradition properly.

关 键 词：引渡 双重犯罪原则 孟晚舟案 可罚性标准 实质性类似 

分 类 号：D997.9[政治法律—刑法学]