功能性匿名方法对个人信息界分标准的重塑  被引量:2

Reinvention of Personal Information Boundary Standards under Functional Anonymization

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:宋云婷 SONG Yun-ting(School of Law,Nanjing University,Nanjing Jiangsu 210093,China)

机构地区:[1]南京大学法学院,江苏南京210093

出  处:《太原理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2022年第2期72-82,共11页Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)

摘  要:我国个人信息保护立法以“可识别性”为标准划分个人信息保护范围。因该标准的自身缺陷,各国在数字化环境的实践中遇到不同的适用困境。功能性匿名将信息保护传统的一元标准转化为风险控制,从而极好地满足了信息利用与信息保护的双向需求。我国宜分整体架构与细节流程调整两步走,以递进的方式引入功能性匿名方法。对功能性匿名运行的评价可抽取外部约束与内部治理二阶层的五个指标,并从数据生命周期的角度应用该评价系统。In the legislation of personal information protection in China,“identifiability”has always been regarded as a hard criterion to classify the scope of personal information protection.Due to its deficiencies,the application of this criterion in the digital environment meets bewilderment in various countries.The functional anonymization transforms the traditional problem of the traditional solo criterion into risk control,which satisfies the two-way demand of information utilization and information protection perfectly.In this regard,China should take two steps of overall framework adjustment and detailed process optimization,introducing functional anonymization in a progressive way.The evaluation of functional anonymization operation can draw five indicators from external constraint and internal governance,and the evaluation system should be applied from the perspective of data life cycle.

关 键 词:个人信息 “可识别性”标准 匿名化 功能性匿名 数据生命周期 

分 类 号:D923[政治法律—民商法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象