检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐晓惠 张耀华[1] 徐敏[1] 张明浩[1] XU Xiaohui;ZHANG Yaohua;XU Min;ZHANG Minghao(School of Educational Science,Institute for Education and Treatment of Problematic Youth,Ludong University,Yantai 264011)
机构地区:[1]鲁东大学教育科学学院(问题青少年教育矫正管理研究院),烟台264011
出 处:《心理与行为研究》2022年第2期274-281,共8页Studies of Psychology and Behavior
基 金:教育部人文社科一般项目(17yja880097)。
摘 要:本研究考察社会比较对大学生公平感知的影响,并探讨主观社会经济地位在其中的调节作用。控制社会比较的方向、不公平程度及有无代价等因素,结果发现,社会比较会影响大学生的公平感知,在向上社会比较条件下,大学生更愿意选择平等选项;主观社会经济地位能够调节社会比较对大学生公平感知的影响,低主观社会经济地位大学生在向下社会比较时更愿意选择平等选项。大学生具有较强的公平感知,关注自身利益是否最大化。The current study examined the effects of social comparison on college students’sense of fairness,and explored the moderating role of subjective social status.We recruited 265 college students and used an experimental design which contains social comparison,the degree of unfairness and whether there is a cost for oneself to achieve the equal split.We also examined participants’subjective social status by using the MacArthur Scale of Subjective SES.The results showed that social comparison had an effect on college students’sense of fairness.Compared to downward social comparison,college students were more inclined to choose the equal split in upward social comparison;subjective social status could moderate the effect of social comparison on college students’sense of fairness,participants in the lower subjective social status tend to choose the equal split in downward social comparison.College students’sense of fairness are quite high,and they mainly focus on how to maximize their interest in resource distribution.
关 键 词:公平感知 不平等规避 社会比较 主观社会经济地位。
分 类 号:B849[哲学宗教—应用心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.4