桐城派的阅读、知识谱系与流派风尚  

The Reading,Knowledge Pedigree and Genre of Tongcheng School

作　　者：刘文龙[1] LIU Wenlong(Literature College,Anhui University,Hefei 230039,China)

机构地区：[1]安徽大学文学院,安徽合肥230039

出　　处：《安徽史学》2022年第3期142-151,共10页Historical Research In Anhui

基　　金：安徽省社科创新发展研究攻关项目“‘桐城二姚’与近代学术研究”(2021CX167);广西大学文学与文化研究中心立项课题“《涵通楼师友文抄》整理与研究”(XDWX202203)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：桐城派效法韩愈的读书旨趣,逐渐形成独具特色的读书法。这也规定了桐城派的书籍选择范围,甚至推衍成独具桐城风味的书单。其书单的增删,能反映桐城派在不同时期的新气象及其酝酿的缘由。桐城派的说经实践又是其读书法的具体运用,“文本于经”“文能通经”“说经之文是古文”是其三个重要内涵。而对桐城派“空疏”的批评因此得以展开,这一批评直接影响到对桐城派学术品格的判断。由此还可以进一步得出桐城派的经典化与知识系谱建构一直处于“进行时”的结论。The Tongcheng School imitated Han Yu’s interest in reading and gradually formed a unique reading method.This also stipulated the range of Tongcheng school’s book selection,and even deduced it into a book list with a unique Tongcheng flavor.The additions and deletions of his book list can reflect the new atmosphere of the Tongcheng School in different periods and the reasons for its brewing.The practice of interpreting scriptures of the Tongcheng School was the specific application of its reading method.“Literature rooted in the five classics”,“Literature can assist interpretation of confucian classics”and“The text that interprets the classics was literature”were its three important connotations.As a result,the criticism of the Tongcheng School’s“emptiness”was unfolded,and this criticism directly affected the judgment of the Tongcheng School’s academic character.From this,it can be further concluded that the canonization and the construction of knowledge genealogy of Tongcheng School were always in“progressive”.

关 键 词：桐城派 阅读 书单 说经 空疏 

分 类 号：K249[历史地理—历史学] I207.62[历史地理—中国史]