检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:梁泽敏 LIANG Ze-min(China University of Political Science and Law School of Criminal Justice,Beijing 100089,China)
出 处:《湖北工业职业技术学院学报》2022年第2期27-33,共7页Journal of Hubei Industrial Polytechnic
摘 要:司法公开的信息化迫使被追诉人个人信息广泛而长久地暴露于信息网络,庞大的数据库功能随时可能干涉被追诉人的信息安全。刑事程序法领域尚未充分重视被追诉人信息保护的程序价值,司法公开职权色彩明显,具体操作层面缺乏统一的文本规范等。基于此,刑事程序法应看到被追诉人信息保护的程序价值,转变司法公开的权力本位主义,注重保障被追诉人涉信息公开的知情同意权、救济监督权,完善犯罪记录社会退出机制,同时探索建立诉讼文书公开的“一站式递进”系统,实现监督和运转的一体化。The informatization of judicial disclosure exposes the personal information of the accused to the network widely and permanently,and the huge database may put the information of the accused at risk.The criminal procedure law does not attach importance to the procedural value of the information protection of the prosecuted person,the authority has the say on judicial disclosure,and there is a lack of uniform text specifications at the operational level.Based on these,the Criminal Procedure Law should respect the procedural value of the information protection of the prosecuted,apply a principles-based approach to judicial disclosure,protect the rights of the accused——the right of informed consent and the right of relief and supervision,and improve the criminal record withdrawal mechanism.At the same time,establish a one-stop progressive system for the disclosure of litigation documents to realize the integration of supervision and operation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222