检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨文松 容丽[1,2] 叶天木 王梦洁 李璇 王琪[1,2] 李婷婷[1,2] 曾珍[1,2] YANG Wen-song;RONG Li;YE Tian-mu;WANG Meng-jie;LI Xuan;WANG Qi;LI Ting-ting;ZENG zhen(School of Geography and Environmental Sciences(School of Karst Science),Guizhou Normal University,Guiyang 550001,China;Puding Karst Ecosystem Research Station,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Puding 562100,Guizhou,China)
机构地区:[1]贵州师范大学地理与环境科学学院(喀斯特研究院),贵阳550001 [2]中国科学院普定喀斯特生态系统观测研究站,贵州普定562100
出 处:《应用生态学报》2022年第5期1215-1222,共8页Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology
基 金:普定喀斯特生态系统观测研究站野外调查基金项目([2020]05号);国家十三五重点研发计划项目(2016YFC0502607);贵州省科技计划重大专项(黔科合平台人才[2017]5411号);贵州省世界一流学科建设计划项目(黔教科研发[2019]125号)资助。
摘 要:以黔中天龙山2 hm^(2)喀斯特次生林为对象,采用成对相关函数g(r)结合完全随机模型(CSR)研究重要值前4位优势树种的空间分布格局及其关联性。结果表明:样地树种的径级结构呈倒“J”型分布,在优势树种窄叶石栎和圆果化香的影响下,第Ⅴ径级(≥10 cm)的数量较多。窄叶石栎呈现倒“J”型分布,种群更新良好,处于生长发育初级阶段;而圆果化香和云南鼠刺随着径级的增大数量逐渐递增,成年树、大树数量远多于幼树、小树,表明该种群更新不足,处于生长发育的中后期并逐渐衰退。除窄叶石栎外,其余优势树种整体呈现出在较大尺度上聚集分布,聚集程度随着尺度的增大逐渐下降并趋于随机分布,此规律在幼树径级中表现得尤为突出;而受各种因素的影响,各个树种不同径级呈现出不同的空间分布格局。在种间关联上,4个优势树种之间大多呈现负关联或者无关联关系,树种重要值越高与其他优势树种关联程度越低,呈现负关联的2个树种在小尺度上关联程度最低,随着尺度的增大负关联程度逐渐降低并趋向于无显著关联。We analyzed the spatial distribution pattern and correlation of the top four dominant tree species in a 2 hm^(2) karst secondary forest plot of Tianlong Mountain in central Guizhou,using pairwise correlation function g(r)combined with a completely random model(CSR).The results showed that the diameter structure of trees followed an inverted J-shape,and that more trees belonged to diameter classⅤ(≥10 cm)driven by the dominant trees of Lithocarpus confinis and Platycarya longipes.L.confinis presented an inverted J-shaped distribution,and the population could renew very well and was in the primary growth stage.The abundance of P.longipes and Itea yunnanensis increased gradually with increasing diameter class.The density of grown and large trees was far more than the young and small individuals,which indicated poor population regeneration,and the population was in the middle and late growth stages.The top dominant tree species,except L.confinis,showed clustering distribution at large scale,which was decreased gradually with scale and trended to distribute randomly.The pattern was particularly prominent in the diameter class for young trees.Different diameter classes of different tree species presented diffe-rent spatial distribution patterns which influenced by many factors.In terms of interspecific associations,the four dominant tree species showed negative or no associations.The higher importance value of tree species,the lower the degree of association with other dominant species.The two negative correlation tree species had the lowest degree of correlation at small scale.With the increase of spatial scale,the degree of negative correlation decreased gradually,and tended to be no correlation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249