检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:师文 陈昌凤[2] 吕宇翔[2] SHI Wen;CHEN Chang-feng;LV Yu-xiang(School of Journalism and Communication,Jinan University,Guangzhou 510632,China;School of Journalism and Communication,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China)
机构地区:[1]暨南大学新闻与传播学院,广东广州510632 [2]清华大学新闻与传播学院,北京100084
出 处:《编辑之友》2022年第4期82-89,共8页Editorial Friend
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目“智能时代的信息价值观引领研究”(18ZDA307);清华大学计算与智能传播实验室项目。
摘 要:虽然算法作为科学术语的内涵相对确定,但算法在与新闻传播学界发生交涉的过程中延展出一系列丰富的外延。在智能媒体研究经历了数年蓬勃发展之际,为理解算法研究各方向的分歧所在,促进不同研究路径之间的对话,文章试图剖析多元算法研究视角所依托的迥然不同的算法定义,采用话语研究视角,分析不同研究对算法持有的观念及其相应的支撑逻辑。在综述十九大以来智能媒体研究的基础上,探究学术界开展算法研究的认识论基础。党的十九大以来,学术界围绕算法形成的话语被归为六类——算法是工具、算法是规则、算法是权力、算法是主体、算法是想象、算法是价值表达,不同话语的逻辑、关键发现、进步性与局限性也得到具体诠释。Although the definition of the algorithm as a scientific term is rather fixed,it has a series of rich extensions after it encounters the field of journalism and communication.When AI media research has experienced several years of vigorous development,there exists the needs to understand the divergence of different algorithm researches and promote the conversations.Thus,this research attempts to analyze the very different definitions of algorithms that different researches rely on.Discourse perspective rather than essential list perspective is adopted to analyze the concepts and logic behind distinct algorithm definitions.By reviewing the existing AI media researches,this paper explores the epistemological basis of algorithm researches.The discourses formed around algorithms are classified into six categories:algorithms are tools,algorithms are rules,algorithms are power,algorithms are subjects,algorithms are imagination,and algorithms are expressions of value.Besides,the logic,key findings,progress and limitations of different discourses are also elaborated in detail.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229