研究心理护理对老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者临床护理效果的影响  

To Study the Effect of Psychological Nursing on Clinical Nursing Effect of Elderly Patients with COPD

作　　者：赵林 ZHAO Lin(Fushun City Central Hospital,Fushun 113006,China)

机构地区：[1]抚顺市中心医院,辽宁抚顺113006

出　　处：《中国医药指南》2022年第15期41-44,共4页Guide of China Medicine

摘　　要：目的通过对比简列数据,对心理护理对老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者临床护理效果的影响进行研究,并验证此项护理方法的有效性、安全性。方法80例研究对象筛选自本院在2019年1月至2020年1月期间收治的老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者,为了满足研究需求,本次研究采取随机数字表法对上述患者进行分组,其中一组为对照组,此组所采取的护理方法为常规护理,另一组为研究组,此组所采取的护理方法为常规护理+心理护理,每组患者均为40例。为了验证心理护理在老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病护理中的效果,此次研究对SDS评分、SAS评分,以及护理有效率、护理满意度和二氧化碳分压、氧分压指标、生活质量、睡眠质量予以评价,且将相关数据予以统计分析并做总结性报告。结果研究组患者的护理效果显优且具有一定实施价值,其护理效果各项评分改善情况显著优于对照组患者的相关情况。两组患者护理前,研究组患者SDS评分、SAS评分与对照组比较,其差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组患者通过护理后,研究组患者SDS评分、SAS评分明显低于对照组(P<0.05);其中研究组护理有效率为97.50%,对照组护理有效率为77.50%,研究组护理有效率高于对照组(P<0.05);研究组护理满意度为100.00%,对照组护理满意度为77.50%,研究组护理满意度高于对照组(P<0.05);研究组二氧化碳分压、氧分压指标明显优于对照组(P<0.05);两组之间比较,其差异有统计学意义。研究组的生活质量和对照组进行了比较,结果可见,两组护理前数据对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),护理后研究组生活质量评分比对照组高(P<0.05),且各组内护理前后对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组的睡眠质量和对照组进行比较,结果可见,两组护理前数据对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),护理后研究组睡眠质量评分比对照组低(P<0.05),且各组内护理前后对比差�Objective To study the effect of psychological nursing on the clinical nursing effect of elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,and to verify the effectiveness and safety of this nursing method.Methods Eighty research subjects were selected from elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease admitted to our hospital from January 2019 to January 2020.In order to meet the research needs,this study adopted the random number table method to group the above patients.One group is the control group,the nursing method adopted in this group is routine nursing,the other group is the study group,the nursing method adopted in this group is routine nursing and psychological nursing,and there are 40 patients in each group.In order to verify the effect of psychological nursing in elderly chronic obstructive pulmonary disease nursing,this study used SDS score and SAS score to compare the nursing efficiency,nursing satisfaction,carbon dioxide partial pressure,oxygen partial pressure,quality of life,The sleep quality was evaluated,and the relevant data were statistically analyzed and a summary report was made.Results The nursing effect of the patients in the study group was excellent and had certain implementation value,and the improvement of various scores of the nursing effect was significantly better than that of the patients in the control group.Before nursing,there was no significant difference in SDS and SAS scores between the study group and the control group(P>0.05);after nursing,the SDS and SAS scores of the study group were significantly lower than the control group(P<0.05);the nursing effective rate of the study group was 97.50%,the nursing effective rate of the control group was 77.50%,and the nursing effective rate of the study group was higher than that of the control group(P<0.05);the nursing satisfaction of the study group was 100.00%,the nursing satisfaction of the control group was 77.50%,and the nursing satisfaction of the study group was higher than that of the control group(P<

关 键 词：心理护理 老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病 临床护理效果 睡眠质量 生活质量 护理有效率 焦虑、抑郁评分 

分 类 号：R473.5[医药卫生—护理学]