1872年之前的西方洪水神话研究及其话语旨归  

Research on the Flood Myth in Western Countries Before 1872 and Its Discourse Purpose

作　　者：刘潋 Liu Lian(School of Chinese Language and Literature, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024, Hebei)

机构地区：[1]河北师范大学文学院,河北石家庄050024

出　　处：《长江大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第2期7-13,共7页Journal of Yangtze University（Social Sciences Edition）

基　　金：河北师范大学人文社会科学校内科研基金项目“亚洲地区洪水神话类型研究”(2019B005)。

摘　　要：1872年,乔治·史密斯破译了美索不达米亚地区出土的洪水神话泥板,发现《圣经》洪水记述起源于美索不达米亚文明,此后洪水神话研究开始发生重大转变。在史密斯之前,《圣经》洪水神话相关研究尚无法脱离神学框架,所有阐释都基于基督教神学观念,呼应着基督教神学的“逻各斯”观念及其线性历史时间观,即便偶有背离,也无人敢于承认洪水神话的多源化现象,而是把《圣经》洪水记述视为世界洪水神话的唯一源头。剖析史密斯之前的《圣经》洪水记述研究,挖掘这些研究与神学观念的内在呼应,不仅有助于从更宏大的历史背景中去认识洪水神话研究,也有助于从神话与神学的关系上进一步思考神话学的产生与建立过程。In 1872,George Smith deciphered the flood myth tablet unearthed in Mesopotamia,and found that the biblical account of flood originated from Mesopotamian civilization.Since then,the study of the flood myth has begun to undergo a major shift.Before Smith,the research on the biblical flood myth still could not be separated from the theological framework.All interpretations were based on Christian theological concepts,echoing the“Logos”concept of Christian theology and its linear historical view of time.Even if there were occasional interpretations that deviated from the theology’s logos concept,no one dared to acknowledge the multi-source phenomenon of the flood myth,but viewed the biblical flood account as the only source of all the flood myths around the world.Analyzing the biblical flood narrative researches before Smith’s discovery and excavating the inner echoes of these researches and theological concepts will notonly help us to understand the flood myth researches from a larger historical background,but also help us to further think about the process of the emergence and establishment of mythology through the relationship between mythology and theology.

关 键 词：《圣经》洪水神话 基督教神学 逻各斯 同源论 

分 类 号：B932[哲学宗教—宗教学]