检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:唐婷[1] TANG Ting(School of Literature and Journalism,Chengdu University,Chengdu 610106,China)
机构地区:[1]成都大学文学与新闻传播学院,四川成都610106
出 处:《西华师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2022年第3期83-88,共6页Journal of China West Normal University:Philosophy & Social Sciences
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大招标项目(10&ZD101)。
摘 要:日本《诗经》研究在江户时期(1603—1868)成果丰硕,具有鲜明的阶段特征,前期朱子学独尊,中期汉、宋兼采,到后期《诗经》汉学复兴,从宏观诗旨到具体字词阐释皆转向遵从毛郑。江户后期时值中国朴学大兴,在考据为治学主流的风气下,日本学者阐释具体问题时,并不盲从清代考据学成果,选择遵从《诗序》、毛郑,扬弃之间体现了江户后期《诗经》研究对毛郑所主张的《诗》教的系统接受。During the Edo period(1603-1868),the study of The Book of Songs in Japan yielded substantial results with distinct stage characteristics.In the early period,Zhuxi’s school enjoyed exclusive respect.In the middle period,the theories of the Han and Song dynasties were adopted simultaneously.In the late period,the study of the Han school of classical philology like The Book of Songs was revived.From macroscopic poetic intention to specific interpretation of words and phrases,Japanese scholars only regarded the Mao’s and the Zheng’s works as the classics.Their sublation reflected the systematic acceptance of the teaching of The Poems advocated by Mao Zheng in the study of The Book of Songs in the late Edo period.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229