检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:万金平 林建贵 罗流涛 许振强 WAN Jinping;LIN Jiangui;LUO Liutao;XU Zhenqiang(Department of Urology Surgery,Zhangzhou Hospital of Fujian Medical University,Fujian Province,Zhangzhou,363000,China)
机构地区:[1]福建医科大学附属漳州市医院泌尿外科,福建漳州363000
出 处:《中国当代医药》2022年第11期20-23,28,共5页China Modern Medicine
摘 要:目的通过进行微通道经皮肾镜取石术(MPCNL)与标准通道经皮肾镜取石术(SPCNL)治疗上尿路结石的系统评价,比较两种手术方式的安全性及手术效果。方法检索Pubmed、Cochrane Library、Embase、万方、中国知网以及维普数据库中有关经皮肾镜取石术治疗上尿路结石患者的随机对照试验,检索时限为建库起至2019年12月1日,由2名评价者按照纳入与排除标准选择试验、提取资料后采用Revman 5.3软件进行meta分析。结果本研究共纳入4项随机对照试验,共计375例患者。分析结果显示,MPCNL组治疗过程中的肾盂内压力(RPP)高于SPCNL组,差异有统计学意义(MD=10.38,95%CI:6.37~14.38,P<0.00001);MPCNL组的术后发热(POF)率高于SPCNL组,差异有统计学意义(OR=2.43,95%CI:1.39~4.27,P=0.002);MPCNL组和SPCNL组的手术时间比较,差异无统计学意义(MD=5.69,95%CI:-4.54~15.91,P=0.28);MPCNL组和SPCNL组的清石率比较,差异无统计学意义(OR=1.06,95%CI:0.61~1.86,P=0.83)。结论MPCNL相比SPCNL可以增加术中的RPP,同时使患者POF率也相应增加,二者在手术效果如手术时间、清石率方面相当,所以MPCNL术中检测RPP对于确保患者安全、减少术后并发症具有重要意义。Objective To systematically evaluate the safety and efficacy of surgery between mini-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy(MPCNL)and standard-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy(SPCNL)in the treatment of upper urinary tract calculi.Methods Pubmed,Cochrane Library,Embase,Wanfang,CNKI and VIP databases were searched for randomized controlled trials related to percutaneous nephrolithotomy for patients with upper urinary calculi from the establishment of the database to December 1,2019.Two evaluators selected the trials according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria,and the data were extracted and analyzed by Revman 5.3 software for meta analysis.Results Four randomized controlled trials were included in this study,with a total of 375 patients.The results showed that the renal pelvis pressure(RPP)in MPCNL group was higher than that in SPCNL group,and the difference was statistically significant(MD=10.38,95%CI:6.37-14.38,P<0.00001).The postoperative fever(POF)rate in MPCNL group was higher than that in SPCNL group,the difference was statistically significant(OR=2.43,95%CI:1.39-4.27,P=0.002).There was no significant difference in the operative time between the MPCNL group and the SPCNL group(MD=5.69,95%CI:-4.54-15.91,P=0.28).There was no significant difference in stone clearing rate between MPCNL group and SPCNL group(OR=1.06,95%CI:0.61-1.86,P=0.83).Conclusion Compared with SPCNL,MPCNL can increase intraoperative RPP and the patients′POF rate.The two have similar surgical effect such as operation time and stone clearing rate.Therefore,the intraoperative detection of RPP by MPCNL is of great significance to ensure patient safety and reduce postoperative complications.
关 键 词:标准通道经皮肾镜取石术 微通道经皮肾镜取石术 肾盂内压力 系统评价 META分析
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222