检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邹自玉 唐红梅[2] 吴丽 陈荣凤[2] 梅花 ZOU Zi-yu;TANG Hong-mei;WU Li;CHEN Rong-feng;MEI Hua(Graduate School,Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Shanghai 200120,China;School of Nursing and Health Management,Shanghai University of Medicine&Health Sciences 201318,China)
机构地区:[1]上海中医药大学研究生院,上海200120 [2]上海健康医学院护理与管理学院,上海201318
出 处:《护理学报》2022年第9期42-46,共5页Journal of Nursing(China)
基 金:上海市2020年度“科技创新行动计划”科普专项项目(20DZ2311100)。
摘 要:目的 以范围综述的研究方法为基础,汇总相关文献,确定目前乳腺癌相关健康教育材料的可读性水平。方法计算机检索Cochrane Library、PubMed、Web of Science、中国知网、维普中文期刊文献库、万方医学数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库,并辅以人工检索,检索时限均从建库至2022年4月,由2名评价者对文献进行筛选、收集、提取并总结。结果 共检索文献3 028篇,最终纳入13篇,大多数材料的可读性水平高于指南推荐的六年级水平。结论 关于乳腺癌相关健康教育材料的可读性评估文献数量较少,有限的证据表明,大多数健康教育材料较难阅读,国内关于乳腺癌健康教育材料的可读性研究不足。Objective To conduct a scoping review of the readability of breast cancer related health education materials. Methods We collected Chinese and English literature in Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, Wangfang Data, and CBM from the inception to April 2022. Two researchers extracted and summarized the literature. Results A total of 3,028 pieces of literature were retrieved, and 13 eligible were collected. The readability of most of the materials was above the recommended level of sixth grade. Conclusion There is fewer literature on readability assessment of breast cancer related health education materials.Limited evidence indicates that most health education materials are difficult to read, and there is still inadequate research on readability of breast cancer related health education materials in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.130