“医事法学”相关名称争议及其本质思考  

Studying on the Disputes on the Relevant Names of"Medical Law"and Its Essence

作　　者：陈伟伟 董天进 刘毅 Chen Weiwei(Law School of Central South University,Changsha,P.R.China.)

机构地区：[1]中南大学法学院,湖南长沙410000 [2]四川省社会科学院 [3]西南医科大学法学院

出　　处：《中国卫生事业管理》2022年第5期371-375,共5页Chinese Health Service Management

基　　金：国家社会科学基金教育学一般课题“法治中国背景下我国医事法学本科教育标准研究”(BIA170183);四川省社会科学高水平研究团队建设计划资助。

摘　　要：“卫生法学”“医事法学”“生命法学”等相关名称目前存在多元使用之局面,主要反映于概念关系的多元化和专业设置、命名的多样化之上,追溯各名称诞生的历史背景可以发现,特定的历史背景赋予了其各自特定狭义之内涵,有助于其借助社会现实需求“向上生长”,而伴随时代发展,在众多学者试图从多种角度破除名称狭义之壁垒,寻求各自名称作为广义的学科代称之解释时,亦促进了本学科“向下扎根”,形成稳固的理论根基。因此各名称之狭义与广义解释均有其历史价值和时代内涵,学界应形成对各名称均有狭义及广义理解之共识,促进学科更好发展。“Health law”,“medical law”,“life law”,and other related names are currently used in multiple ways,which is mainly reflected in the diversification of conceptual relations and professional setting and naming.Tracing back to the historical background of the birth of each name,it can be found that the specific historical background gives its own specific narrow meaning,which can help them to"grow upward"based on the needs of social reality.With the development of the times,when many scholars try to break the barriers of narrow names from various ways and seek the explanation of their respective names as broad discipline representatives,it also promotes the discipline to"take root downward"and form a solid theoretical foundation.Therefore,the narrow and broad interpretation of each name has its historical value and era connotation.The academic community should form a consensus on the narrow and broad understanding of each name to further promote the development of the discipline.

关 键 词：卫生法学 医事法学 生命法学 

分 类 号：R197[医药卫生—卫生事业管理] D912[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]