“公众参与环境治理”机制的发展模式研究及对我国的启示——基于定性比较分析法(QCA)  

QCA-based Study on the Development Pattern of the Public-participation-in-environmental governance Mechanism and Inspiration to China

作　　者：张会恒[1] 马凯翔 ZHANG Huiheng;MA Kaixiang

机构地区：[1]安徽财经大学安徽经济发展研究院,安徽蚌埠233000 [2]安徽财经大学经济学院,安徽蚌埠233000

出　　处：《江汉大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第3期30-42,124,125,共15页Journal of Jianghan University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：安徽省哲学社会科学规划重大项目“习近平生态文明思想的安徽实践研究”(AHSKZD2018D04);安徽财经大学研究生科研创新基金项目(ACYC2020233)。

摘　　要：以不同国家环境治理的公众参与机制为研究对象,运用定性比较分析法(QCA)对“公众参与环境治理”机制的发展模式进行研究。研究提炼了影响机制发展的六项结构因素,包括政府信息透明度、司法体系支持度、社会监督的有效性、ENGO的发展状况、新闻媒体自由度、公众的环保意识。通过定性比较分析发现,“芬兰模式”和“美国模式”是“公众参与环境治理”机制发展的代表性模式;公众的环保意识是机制发展的基础,健全的司法体系、环境信息的透明和新闻报道的自由是成熟的“公众参与环境治理”机制形成的充分条件;成熟的“公众参与环境治理”机制一般有特色的发展路径。The qualitative comparative analysis(QCA)method is adopted to study the development pattern of the public-participation-in-environmental-governance(PPEG)mechanism based on the public participation mechanisms of different countries in environmental governance.It has discovered six structural factors that affect the mechanism’s development,including government’s information transparency,the support of the judiciary system,the effectiveness of social supervision,the development of the ENGO,freedom of the news media,and the environmental protection awareness of the public.A clear QCA finds that the Finnish pattern and the US pattern are the representatives of the PPEG mechanism’s development patterns;that while the public’s environmental protection awareness is the basis of the mechanism’s development,a sound judiciary system,the transparency of environmental information,and the freedom of news report are sufficient conditions for the formation of PPEG;and that a mature PPEG mechanism generally has a development path of its own special features.

关 键 词：公众参与 环境治理 发展模式 定性比较分析(qca) 

分 类 号：X32[环境科学与工程—环境工程] C916[经济管理]