中国公共政策定量研究:类型、趋势和策略——基于2011—2020年间六类社会领域政策的分析  

Quantitative Research on Public Policy in China: Types, Trends and Strategies: Based on the Analysis of Six Types of Social Sector Policies from 2011 to 2020

作　　者：郭啸 岳洪江 GUO Xiao;YUE Hongjiang(College of Public Administration,Nanjing Audit University,Nanjing 211815,China)

机构地区：[1]南京审计大学公共管理学院,江苏南京211815

出　　处：《乐山师范学院学报》2022年第5期97-103,共7页Journal of Leshan Normal University

基　　金：江苏省研究生科研创新计划项目“中国公共政策定量研究:类型、趋势和策略”(KYCX21_1932);“十四五”江苏哲学社会科学发展规划前瞻研究(20ZLA024);江苏省社会科学基金重点项目“‘双一流’背景下江苏哲学社会科学一流学科治理与建设研究”(18JYA003);教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“基本公共服务均等化实施效度和实现程度研究”(18JZD047)。

摘　　要：定量方法是推动公共政策研究突破的重要工具,辨析定量定性之争是公共管理研究无法回避的问题。以我国2011—2020年经济、科技、社会、教育、卫生、综合六类政策研究文献为研究对象,借助文献内容分析的方法,统计公共政策定量研究的发展趋势、类型特征,以及定量数据的来源途径。系统回答使用定量的公共政策研究是否比定性公共政策研究有更大影响力的争论。归纳了公共政策研究定量方法运用的偏差、定量研究推广存在的障碍。提出了未来公共政策研究的策略导向,根据公共政策研究需要选取适宜的研究方法。Quantitative methods are important tools to promote breakthroughs in public policy research.Discrimination of quantitative and qualitative disputes is an unavoidable issue in public management research.This article takes China’s 2011-2020 economic, science and technology, society, education, health, and comprehensive policy research literature as the research object. With the help of the method of literature content analysis, this paper analyzes the development trend, type and characteristics of quantitative research on public policy, as well as the source of quantitative data. This paper systematically answers the debate on whether the use of quantitative public policy research has more influence than qualitative public policy research. This paper summarizes the deviation in the application of quantitative methods in public policy research and the obstacles in the popularization of quantitative research. Finally, this paper puts forward the strategic orientation of future public policy research, and selects appropriate research methods according to the needs of public policy research.

关 键 词：公共政策 定量研究 方法运用 

分 类 号：D601[政治法律—政治学]