出 处:《中国美容医学》2022年第5期155-158,共4页Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine
摘 要:目的:分析3H-4A-5S护理服务在产后妊娠纹修复治疗中的应用效果。方法:选择2020年6月-2021年6月于笔者医院就诊的122例产后妊娠纹就医者,按随机数字表法随机分为观察组(n=61)和常规组(n=61),两组就医者均通过多通道射频仪修复妊娠纹,常规组进行妊娠纹相关知识宣教,观察组在常规组基础上进行3H-4A-5S服务干预,比较干预前后两组就医者妊娠纹知晓情况、心理弹性、应对方式、护理满意度。结果:干预后,两组就医者妊娠纹相关知识知晓率(症状表现、自然预后、治疗方法、最佳治疗时间)较护理前显著提高(P<0.05),且观察组知晓率显著高于常规组(P<0.05);干预后,两组就医者应对方式中积极应对(面对、乐观,姑息,依靠自我、支持等)评分较干预前显著提高(P<0.05),消极应对(回避、认命、情绪抒发)评分较干预前显著降低(P<0.05),且观察组显著优于常规组(P<0.05);干预后,两组就医者心理弹性评分(坚韧、乐观、力量)较干预前显著提高(P<0.05),且观察组干预后评分显著高于常规组(P<0.05);干预后,观察组和常规组的护理满意度分别为93.44%、80.33%,观察组总满意度显著高于常规组(P<0.05)。结论:3H-4A-5S护理服务能提高产后妊娠纹修复治疗就医者的认知水平,提升就医者自我效能,改善其应对方式,进而提高就医者护理满意度,值得推广使用。Objective To analyze the effect of 3H-4A-5S nursing service in the repair treatment of patients with postpartum stretch marks.Methods 122 patients with postpartum stretch marks treated in the hospital were selected between June 2020 and June 2021,and were randomly divided into observation group(n=61)and routine group(n=61)according to the random number table method.The two groups of patients adopted multi-channel radiofrequency instrument to repair stretch marks,and the routine group carried out health education about stretch marks,and the observation group underwent 3H-4A-5S service intervention on this basis.The stretch mark awareness,psychological elasticity,coping styles and nursing satisfaction of the two groups were compared before and after intervention.Results In the intervention,stretch marks awareness,psychological elasticity,coping style,and nursing satisfaction of the two groups before and after the intervention were compared.Results:After the intervention,the knowledge awareness rate of stretch marks in the two groups(symptom manifestations,natural prognosis,treatment methods,and optimal treatment time)was significantly higher than that before nursing(P<0.05),and the awareness rate of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the conventional group(P<0.05).After the intervention,the positive response(face,optimistic,appeasedself-reliance,support score)scores in the coping style of the two groups were significantly higher than that of before the intervention(P<0.05),and the negative response(avoidance,acceptance,The emotional expression score was signifi cantly lower than that before the intervention(P<0.05),and the observation group was signifi cantly better than that of the conventional group(P<0.05).After the intervention,the psychological elasticity score(tenacity,optimism,strength)of the patients in the two groups was signifi cantly higher than that before the intervention(P<0.05),and the post-intervention score of the study group was signifi cantly higher than that of the conve
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...