标准必要专利FRAND声明的法律性质辨析  

Analysis of the Legal Nature of Standard Essential Patent’s FRAND Declaration

作　　者：李昌凤[1] Li Changfeng(Department of Law,Henan Provincial Party School,Zhengzhou City,Henan Province,450046)

机构地区：[1]中共河南省委党校(河南行政学院)法学教研部,河南郑州450046

出　　处：《黄河科技学院学报》2022年第6期78-84,共7页Journal of Huanghe S&T College

摘　　要：FRAND声明的法律性质是标准必要专利纠纷中的一个焦点问题。国内外理论界和实务界对此分歧较大,国内法院已有判例也呈现出立场迥异的局面。在我国的法律语境下,应当抛弃既往的单向限定解释路径,转而采用双向耦合界定路径,将FRAND声明的法律性质界定为“要约邀请”。FRAND声明的“要约邀请”属性,不仅可以与我国的传统法理逻辑和现实法律实践完美契合,兼顾许可各方的利益平衡,还有助于专利技术的推广使用和相关产业的健康有序发展。The legal nature of FRAND declaration is a focus issue in the disputes concerning standard essential patent.The theoretical and practical circles at home and abroad differ greatly on this problem,and the domestic courts’precedents that have existed also take different positions.In the legal context of China,we should abandon the previous one-way limited interpretation path,adopt the two-way coupling definition path,and define the legal nature of FRAND statement as“invitation for offer”.The attribute of“invitation to offer”of FRAND statement can not only perfectly fit with China’s traditional legal logic and practical legal practice,and take into account the balance of interests of all parties concerned,but also contribute to the promotion and use of patented technology and the healthy and orderly development of related industries.

关 键 词：标准必要专利 FRAND声明 要约邀请 利益平衡 目的导向 

分 类 号：D923.42[政治法律—民商法学]