认罪认罚视角下检察机关不起诉权的规范再造  

Reconstruction of the rules about the procuratorial organ’s non-prosecution power from the perspective of plea leniency

作　　者：何静 HE Jing

机构地区：[1]南京工业大学法政学院,江苏南京211816

出　　处：《东南大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2022年第3期108-116,148,共10页Journal of Southeast University(Philosophy and Social Science)

基　　金：2020年度江苏省社科基金项目“国家治理视阈下检察机关不起诉权研究”(20FXB006);2018年度国家社科基金项目“新时代行政公益诉讼中的检察职能研究”(18BFX053)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：在现代国家治理体系中,检察机关不起诉权具有调配司法资源、优化司法职权配置的特殊功能。认罪认罚从宽制度则是现代司法治理体系的重要组成部分,因此,检察机关不起诉权在认罪认罚案件中的合理适用具有独特的价值。不过,审视现行的认罪认罚案件中检察机关不起诉权运行规则,存在着类型未能结构化、起诉替代措施规范缺位以及适用程序法治化程度不足等缺陷。为此,需要优化现行的酌定不起诉制度,实现不起诉类型的结构化。完善起诉替代措施的立法条文,保证其得到有效落实,以实现起诉替代措施的体系化。同时,保障当事人的参与机会,强化决定文书的说理,完善监督救济机制,实现不起诉决定程序的法治化。In the modern state governance system,the procuratorial power of non-prosecution has the special function of allocating judicial resources and optimizing the allocation of judicial authority.The system of plea leniency is an important part of modern judicial governance system.Therefore,the reasonable application of procuratorial power of non-prosecution in cases of plea leniency has unique value.However,by examining the current operating rules,it is found that there are such defects as unstructured types,absence of legal norms for prosecution substitute measures,and insufficient degree of rule of law for applicable procedures.Therefore,it is necessary to optimize the current discretionary non-prosecution system to create the structure of non-prosecution types,and improve the legislative provisions of prosecution substitute measures and ensure their effective implementation to realize the systematism of prosecution substitute measures.At the same time,we should ensure the participation of the parties,enhance the reasoning of the decision documents and improve the supervision and relief mechanism in order to realize the rule of law of the decision procedure for non-prosecution.

关 键 词：认罪认罚 不起诉权 规则缺陷 规范再造 检察机关 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]