检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:罗姝瑶 LUO Shu-yao(School of International Studies,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)
出 处:《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2022年第3期138-144,共7页Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
摘 要:冷战结束后,美国和法国成为非洲最主要的域外干涉国,但现有文献主要从政府换届、国际规范传播等角度来解释它们各自军事干涉行为发生的阶段性变化,而忽视了两国军事干涉决策的相互影响。冷战结束后初期,法国对于美国颠覆法语非洲的担忧曾促使其做出极为冒险的军事干涉决策。在遭遇一系列严重的挫折后,法国意识到传统军事干涉政策难以为继,开始寻求与美国的和解。在这一阶段,法国的军事干涉决策趋于保守,多以调停者或旁观者的姿态出现。进入21世纪后,伊斯兰极端主义成为非洲国家面临的重大威胁,美法在非洲反恐问题上的利益基本一致。共同利益在带来美法军事干涉合作的同时也导致了一定程度的搭便车行为。After the ending of the Cold War,the United States and France have become the two major extraterritorial interfering powers to Africa.However,the current literature tends to interpret the changes in the patterns of their military interventions according to the transition of governments or the spread of international norms,while neglecting the interactions between these two potential interveners.In the early years after the Cold War,the French fear of the United States’plotting to topple the Francophone Africa prompted the country to make several extremely risky military intervention decisions.After meeting with a series of grievous setbacks,France realized the impracticality of continuing its traditional intervention policy and began to seek a rapprochement with the United States.During that period,France often assumed the role of an intermediary or a sideliner in African regional crisis.In the 21st century,with Islamic extremism becoming a major threat to African countries,the US and France have developed a common interest in anti-terrorism operations in Africa,which leads to not only cooperation between American and French military interventions but also free-riding in a way.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:52.15.154.142