检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孔祥俊[1] Kong Xiangjun
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学
出 处:《政法论坛》2022年第3期146-158,共13页Tribune of Political Science and Law
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目“数字网络空间的知识产权治理体系研究”(19ZDA164)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:近年来最高人民法院对于涉外贴牌加工商标侵权认定的司法政策和裁判标准不断翻转,使这一众说纷纭的商标法适用问题变得更加扑朔迷离。“HONDAKIT”案再审判决似乎意在统一法律适用标准,但此后又出现不同裁判,说明其仍未终结此类案件的裁判不一。而且,此类裁判中法律与政策相互交织,政策考量似乎经常成为裁判变化的障眼法和说辞,但回归法律标准和法律裁判终归是正途。此类商标侵权判断最终是以商标侵权构成的法律要件事实,恰当地涵摄用于中国境外识别商品来源而在中国境内实施的商标标志贴附行为,关键是准确认定商标标志贴附性使用与中国境内商标使用的关系,在法律定性上去伪存真由表及里,最终得出恰当的侵权判断结论。用于境外识别的贴附性商标标志使用不构成境内的商标使用和商标侵权,但可以有构成侵权的例外,只是需要将例外情形纳入法律路径,寻求制度化的正当理由。The judicial policy and standards of Supreme People’s Court for the determination of trademark infringement of foreign OEM have been constantly reversed,which makes the application of the Trademark Law more complicated and confusing.The retrial judgment of the"HONDAKIT"case seems to be aimed at unifying the standards for the application of Trademark Law,but the different conclusions and judgments that have appeared since then suggest that the judgments of such cases have not yet been unified.Moreover,such adjudications are intertwined between law and policy,and policy considerations often seem to be a"sleight of hand"and excuse for reverse,however,legal standards should be the right path.This kind of trademark infringement judgment is ultimately based on the legal elements of trademark infringement,and properly cover the adhering use of trademark signs in foreign OEM.The key is to accurately identify the relationship between the adhering use of trademark signs and the use of trademarks in China,and to remove the false and retain the true from the surface to the inside in the legal nature determination,and finally draw an appropriate conclusion of infringement judgment.In principle,the adhering use of trademark signs in foreign OEM does not constitute domestic trademark use and trademark infringement,but exceptions that constitute infringement are allowed.It is only necessary to incorporate exceptions into the legal category to seek institutionalized justification.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222