检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王仙[1] 罗正乾 徐琳黎 周志林[3] 唐君[3] 高海峰[4] 刘恩良[1] 金平[2] WANG Xian;LUO Zhengqian;XU Linli;ZHOU Zhiling;TANG Jun;GAO Haifeng;LIU Enliang;JIN Ping(Institute of Food Crops, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China;Comprehensive Test Site of Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830013, China;Xuzhou Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Xuhuai District, Jiangsu Province, Xuzhou Jiangsu 221245, China;Institute of Plant Protection, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China)
机构地区:[1]新疆农业科学院粮食作物研究所,乌鲁木齐830091 [2]新疆农业科学院综合试验场,乌鲁木齐830013 [3]江苏徐淮地区徐州农业科学研究所,江苏徐州221245 [4]新疆农业科学院植物保护研究所,乌鲁木齐830091
出 处:《新疆农业科学》2022年第5期1093-1098,共6页Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences
基 金:自治区科技支疆项目(2020E02099)。
摘 要:【目的】评价不同甘薯品种的生态适应性,分析新疆各试验区的鉴别力,筛选出适合新疆种植的甘薯新品种,为新疆甘薯新品种的选育和推广提供依据。【方法】采用AMMI模型对2018~2019年新疆甘薯品种区域试验中的5个甘薯品种、3个试验点综合评价,分析5个甘薯品种的稳定性及丰产性,以及3个试验点的鉴别力。【结果】Z15-1和H6-1的稳定性较强,徐薯18号的稳定性较差;Z15-1属于高产稳产品种,可作为示范推广品种;H6-1、印尼紫薯属于低产稳产品种;烟薯25号和徐薯18号属于高产不稳产品种;乌苏试验点对品种的选择性最高,具有较强的代表性,伊宁试验点对品种的鉴别力低。【结论】Z15-1整体表现较好,可在新疆甘薯产区推广种植;烟薯25号和徐薯18号属于高产不稳产品种,可在局部地区示范推广。【Objective】To evaluate the ecological adaptability of different sweet potato varieties,verify the discrimination of various experimental areas in Xinjiang,and screen out new sweet potato varieties suitable for planting in Xinjiang in the hope of providing basis for the breeding and promotion of new sweet potato varieties in the region.【Method】AMMI model was used to comprehensively evaluate 5 sweet potato varieties and 3 pilots in the regional experiment of sweet potato varieties in Xinjiang Autonomous Region from 2018 to 2019 and analyze the stability and high yield of 5 sweet potato varieties and the discrimination of 3 pilots.【Result】The stability of Z15-1 and H6-1 was higher than that of Xushu 18.Z15-1 was a high and stable yield variety,which could be used as a demonstration variety.H6-1,Indonesian purple sweet potato belonged to low-yield and stable varieties;Yanshu No.25 and Xushu No.18 were high-yielding and unstable varieties.Wusu had the highest selection of varieties and had strong representativeness,while Yining had low discrimination.【Conclusion】Z15-1 shows good overall performance,and can be popularized and planted in Xinjiang sweet potato producing area.Yanshu No.25 and Xushu No.18 are high-yielding and unstable varieties,which can be demonstrated and popularized in local areas.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15