乡村治理及其转型的产权逻辑  

The Property Rights Logic of Chinese Rural Governance and Its Transformation

作　　者：罗必良 耿鹏鹏 Luo Biliang;Geng Pengpeng

机构地区：[1]华南农业大学国家农业制度与发展研究院,广州510642

出　　处：《清华大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2022年第3期188-204,219,220,共19页Journal of Tsinghua University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“土地制度变迁与乡村社会治理机制研究”(20&ZD170)。

摘　　要：农地产权制度是中国乡村治理的核心线索。由国家法律赋权、社会认同和农民行为能力三个维度所表达的产权强度及其差异,是导致不同乡村治理模式的内在根源。农耕文化、地权模糊及其关系交易,构成了中国乡村治理的制度遗产。从“产权弱化—关系型治理”向“产权强化—契约型治理”的转型,决定了中国乡村社会从产权模糊走向产权明晰、从关系型交易演变为契约型交易的历史逻辑。在农村土地集体所有的制度框架内,农地确权所内含的产权明晰与稳定预期,正在推进中国乡土社会的转型,一方面逐步撕裂由亲缘地缘所维系的传统村社治理秩序,另一方面以契约化、正式化和法制化的现代化方式,重构“国家有作为”“社会有认同”“人民有参与”的法制、德治与自治相结合的乡村治理体系。The farmland property rights system is the key clue of China’s rural governance.The intensity ofproperty rights and their differences,which are expressed by three dimensions including national legal empowerment,social identity,and peasants’behavioral ability,are the root causes of forming different ruralgovernance models.Farming culture,the ambiguity of property rights,and relationship transactions constitute the institutional heritage of China’s rural governance.The transition from weakening of propertyrights-relational governance to strengthened property rights-contractual governance determines the historical logic of China’s rural society advancing from fuzzy property rights to clear property rights,from relationaltransactions to contractual transactions.Within the framework of the collective ownership of rural land,the clear and stable property rights contained in the land titling motivate the transformation of China’s ruralsociety.On the one hand,it is gradually tearing apart the traditional village governance order maintained bykinship and geography.On the other hand,it reconstructs a rural governance system combining the rule of law(national action),the rule of virtue(social identity),and autonomy(people’s participation)in amodern way of contractualization,formalization and legalization.

关 键 词：产权强度 关系型治理 契约型治理 乡村善治 

分 类 号：F323[经济管理—产业经济] D422.6[政治法律—政治学]