检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王中美 WANG Zhong-mei
机构地区:[1]上海国际问题研究院世界经济研究所
出 处:《国际经贸探索》2022年第5期84-98,共15页International Economics and Trade Research
基 金:上海市浦江人才计划项目(16PJC068)。
摘 要:新一轮的干预主义给全球经济治理带来危机,特别是对现有以新自由主义为基础的治理体系造成动摇。新干预主义的核心仍然是国家利益中心与保护主义,本质上应当是对全球经济治理的反动,但实际影响十分复杂。主要体现为:一是推动全球经济治理格局向划区域结盟对抗发展;二是改变了全球经济治理的基础,在响应全球化生产需要推动深度开放的同时,并行以扩展的“安全”原则;三是促使全球经济治理机制从多边主义重返大国中心主义。这些方面的变化反映着全球经济治理螺旋式上升的轨迹,也反映了广泛的新干预主义仍然重视对外参与治理,因此最终不可能逆转全球化的发展方向。Pervasive interventionism has brought a crisis to global economic governance,especially to the current system of governance based on neoliberalism.The core of neo-interventionism is still the substantive national interests and protectionism,which seems to be reverse to global governance,but the actual influence is much complicated.It is mainly reflected as follows:first,neo-interventionism promotes the development of global economic governance pattern towards cross-regional alliances and confrontation;second,the basic principles of global economic governance turn out to be the deepening of liberalization in parallel with the extended security requirements;third,the shift of global economic governance mechanism returns from multilateralism to great power centralism.These changes reflect a spiraling upward trajectory for global economic governance.As the widespread neo-interventionism still attaches importance to external participation in governance,it is impossible to reverse the direction of globalization finally.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49