解释学视域下“被害人责任”概念之提倡  

A Call for the Term of “Victim Responsibility” from the Perspective of Hermeneutics

作　　者：骆群 LUO Qun(Shanghai University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201701)

机构地区：[1]上海政法学院刑事司法学院

出　　处：《犯罪研究》2022年第1期15-25,共11页Chinese Criminology Review

基　　金：上海市哲学社会科学规划课题“犯罪被害人责任的理论与实务研究”的阶段性研究成果(项目编号:2018BFX002)。

摘　　要：“责任”的通常含义具有积极意义和消极意义的一体两面性,即具有“社会规范所赋予的(社会角色)应为之事”的积极面与“不做或没有做好社会规范所赋予的应为之事而受到的评价或承担的后果”的消极面。作为法律概念的“过错”,其内涵就是行为人对自己的行为以及后果所具有的主观心理状态,包括故意和过失。在被害人对加害人刑事责任的有无及大小的影响研究中,使用“被害人责任”的表述无论是从实质上看还是从性质上及形式上看都优于“被害人过错”的表述。The word “Responsibility” has positive and negative implications: in the positive sense, “responsibility” means the actions(of social characters) endowed by social norms, and in the negative sense, it means “the comments or consequences followed by not taking actions endowed by social norms”. As a legal concept, “fault” means actor’s psychological state about his/her behavior and results, including intention and negligence. In the study on whether the victim has influence on actor’s criminal responsibility or not, the expression of “victim responsibility” is better than that of “victim’s fault”, from the perspective of substance, nature and form.

关 键 词：解释学 责任 过错 被害人责任 被害人过错 

分 类 号：D917[政治法律—法学]