国家自然科学基金项目评审的评价研究——基于2015—2019年满意度调查数据分析  

Research on the Evaluation of National Natural Science Foundation of China Project Review——Based on Satisfaction Survey Analysis from 2015 to 2019

作　　者：刘佳[1,3] 郝艳妮 刘权[3] 冯勇[3] 苑怡[4] Liu Jia;Hao Yanni;Liu Quan;Feng Yong;Yuan Yi(State Key Laboratory of Media Convergence and Communication,Communication University of China,Beijing 100024;Information Center,National Natural Science Foundation of China,Beijing 100085;Bureau of Planning,National Natural Science Foundation of China,Beijing 100085;National Center for Science and Technology Evaluation,Beijing 100081)

机构地区：[1]中国传媒大学媒体融合与传播国家重点实验室,北京100024 [2]国家自然科学基金委员会信息中心,北京100085 [3]国家自然科学基金委员会计划局,北京100085 [4]国家科技评估中心,北京100081

出　　处：《中国科学基金》2022年第2期284-293,共10页Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China

摘　　要：随着科学基金项目申请量的不断增加,科学基金项目评审的满意度越来越受到基金管理单位的关注和重视。国家科技评估中心受国家自然科学基金委员会(以下简称“自然科学基金委”)的委托于2015—2019年间针对项目申请人和评审专家的满意度展开调查,采用统计分析的方法,深度剖析申请人对评审意见的满意度、申请人和评审专家对评审公正性的满意度、对基金委提供管理与服务的满意度,以及对科学基金项目评审管理的了解程度。研究提出采取加大宣传力度、定期开展培训,推行“负责任、讲信誉、计贡献(Responsibility,Cedibility,Contribution,RCC)”评审机制、加大对“打招呼”现象的追查和惩处、提升通讯评审中的申请书指派精准度等管理举措,对于优化改进科学基金管理、提高科学基金公信力和营造良好学术风气都具有重要作用。With the increasing number of applications for National Natural Science Foundation of China(NSFC)projects,more and more attention has been paid to the satisfaction of NSFC project review.Entrusted by the NSFC,National Center for Science and Technology Evaluation conducted a survey on satisfaction survey for project applicants and evaluation experts from 2015 to 2019.We adopted the statistical analysis method to analyze the applicants’satisfaction on review comments,discussed the satisfaction on fairness of evaluation and the management and service provided by NSFC,investigated the understanding of NSFC project review management for project applicants and evaluation experts.The study put forward some management measures,such as increasing publicity,carrying out regular training,implementing RCC evaluation mechanism,increasing the investigation and punishment on the phenomenon of practicing nepotism during program review process.These suggestions play an important role in optimizing and improving the management of science funds,enhancing the credibility of science funds and creating a good academic atmosphere.

关 键 词：国家自然科学基金项目 评审满意度 评审公正性 管理与服务 调查 

分 类 号：N12[自然科学总论]