论我国《著作权法》中出租权规则的协调和完善  

On the Coordination and Improvement of the Rules of Rental Right in the Chinese Copyright Law

作　　者：张伟君[1] Zhang Weijun

机构地区：[1]同济大学法学院

出　　处：《知识产权》2022年第5期61-73,共13页Intellectual Property

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“网络化开放创新范式下企业知识产权市场化保护与价值转化机制研究”(项目批准号:21&ZD142)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：2020年《著作权法》第39条第2款已经明确录音录像制品中的作品著作权人是享有出租权的,虽然这与第10条有关作品出租权的规定以及第44条第2款的表述并不协调,但是这个规定其实是合乎法律逻辑的,不仅具有合理性,也是我国立法遵循国际条约的需要。为了减少法律规则之间的不协调甚至冲突,并且有效地解决司法实践中因为目前出租权规则缺陷而带来的法律适用问题,我国《著作权法》应该对著作权人享有的出租权作出更为合理和协调的制度安排。The newly revised Article 39(2) of the Chinese Copyright Law has clarified that the copyright owner of works embodied in audio and video recordings enjoys the rental right.This is inconsistent with the provisions of Article 10 and Article 44(2) on the right to rent.But it is actually reasonable and it also meets the requirement of the international copyright treaties.In order to reduce the inconsistency and even conflict between rules of rental rights in the same law and effectively solve the legal application problems caused in judicial cases,the Copyright Law should make some changes to the rental rights enjoyed by copyright owners.

关 键 词：发行权 出租权 以录音制品体现的作品 TRIPS协定 世界知识产权组织版权条约 

分 类 号：D923.41[政治法律—民商法学]