检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:樊玲玲 谢朝武[1] 吴贵华[2] FAN Ling-ling;XIE Cao-wu;WU Gui-hua
机构地区:[1]华侨大学旅游学院,福建泉州362011 [2]华侨大学旅游学院实验室
出 处:《华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2022年第3期42-54,共13页Journal of Huaqiao University(Philosophy & Social Sciences)
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(41971182)。
摘 要:智慧旅游城市试点政策是经济新常态背景下城市旅游发展的重要举措,但其政策效应有待进一步检验。基于2007—2016年170个旅游城市的面板数据,利用双重差分模型验证智慧旅游城市建设对城市旅游业绩水平的影响效应并对其传导机制进行分析。研究结果表明:智慧旅游城市建设显著提升了城市旅游业绩且实证结果具有稳健性。城市异质性分析表明,试点政策对不同区域、规模的城市旅游业绩均呈现正向显著效用且表现为不同程度的提升差异,其正向推动表现为“边际效应递增”规律。机制验证方面,智慧旅游城市建设运用现代信息技术,通过规模效应、技术效应和结构效应来实现旅游业绩的提升,促进旅游业发展。The pilot policy of smart tourism cities is an important measure for urban tourism development under the background of the new normal economy,but its policy effect needs to be further tested.Based on the panel data of 170 tourist cities from 2007 to 2016,this paper verifies the impact of smart tourism city construction on the level of urban tourism performance with the DID model and analyze its transmission mechanism,and gets the result that the construction of smart tourism cities has significantly improved urban tourism performance,and the empirical result is reliable.The analysis of urban heterogeneity shows that the pilot policies have a positive and significant effect on the urban tourism performance in different regions and scales with different degrees of improvement,and their positive promotion manifested in the law of“increasing marginal effect”.Mechanism verification shows that the smart tourism city construction has realized improvement of tourism performance and promoted the development of tourism through modern information technology,scale effects,technical effects and structural effects.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.118.37.74