连带债务中免除和时效届满的涉他效力模式--从连带性的规范基础出发  

The Mode of Effects involving Others of Remission and Expiration of Prescription in Solidary Obligations:Starting from the Normative Basis of Solidarity

作　　者：李中原[1] Li Zhong-yuan

机构地区：[1]苏州大学王健法学院

出　　处：《苏州大学学报（法学版）》2022年第2期25-31,共7页Journal of Soochow University：Law Edition

摘　　要：连带债务的涉他效力应当涵盖外部和内部两个方面的影响。我国对于免除和时效届满均倾向于以限制绝对效力模式为原则。以日本为代表则对免除和时效届满均以相对效力模式为原则。比较法上更为普遍的做法则是区分免除和时效届满,对二者分别适用不同的效力模式。差异的根源在于各法域对于连带性的规范基础缺乏统一的认识。连带性的外部规范基础是债权人优位和整体性。连带性的内部规范基础是不当得利和代位权。限制绝对效力模式乃是连带性的规范基础与免除和时效届满的具体特点的最佳结合模式。The effects involving others of solidary obligations should cover both external and internal effects.In China,the legislation tends to take the mode of restricted absolute effects as the principle for remission and expiration of prescription.The mode of relative effects is taken as the principle for both remission and expiration of prescription in Japan and other jurisdictions.A more general practice in comparative law is to distinguish between remission and expiration of prescription,and apply different effectiveness modes in to practice respectively.The root of differences lies in the lack of unified understanding of the normative basis of solidarity in various jurisdictions.The external normative basis of solidarity is the priority of creditor and the integrity.The internal normative basis of solidarity is the unjust enrichment and the subrogation.The mode of restricted absolute effect is the best combination one of the normative basis of solidarity and the specific characteristics of remission and expiration of prescription.

关 键 词：连带债务 免除 诉讼时效 涉他效力 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]