检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:屈蕾蕾[1] QU Lei-lei(Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Department,Baiyin City First People's Hospital)
出 处:《中国标准化》2022年第8期233-235,共3页China Standardization
摘 要:目的:探究良性气道狭窄患者实施气管镜介入标准化治疗的临床总疗效及对狭窄程度的改善效果。方法:遴选2020年3月-2021年3月40例良性气道狭窄患者,参考“随机数字表法”,根据“气道狭窄病因的差异性”分为3组—瘢痕组、肉芽肿组、良性肿瘤组,各纳入17例、15例、8例,均接受气管镜介入标准化治疗;评价指标:治疗总有效率、气管狭窄程度、气促评分。结果:瘢痕组患者治疗总疗效82.35%较肉芽肿组73.33%、良性肿瘤组75.00%明显高(P<0.05);同时经治疗瘢痕组患者较肉芽肿组、良性肿瘤组患者气道狭窄程度明显低,气促评分显著高(P<0.05)。结论:针对良性气道狭窄患者气管镜介入标准化治疗,有利于增强临床整体疗效,促进患者临床症状、体征改善,实现了理想的治疗效果。Objective:To explore the overall clinical effect and improvement of endoscopic stenosis in patients with benign airway stenosis.Methods:40 patients with benign airway stenosis from March 2020 to March 2021 were selected referring to random digital table method,and were divided into three groups:scar,granuloma,and benign tumor,with 17,15 and 8 patients respectively receiving standardized treatment with bronchoscopy intervention.The evaluation indicators included total treatment efficiency,tracheal stenosis degree and qi score.Results:The total efficacy was 82.35% in the scar group,higher than 73.33% in the granuloma group and 75.00% in the benign tumor group(P<0.05);airway stenosis and breath score(P<0.05) in the scar group was remarkably lower than that in the granuloma group and the benign tumor group(P<0.05).Conclusion:Standardized endoscopic interventional therapy for patients with benign airway stenosis is conducive to enhancing the overall clinical effect,promoting the improvement of patient clinical symptoms and signs,and re alizing the ideal treatment effect.
关 键 词:良性气道狭窄 气管镜介入标准化治疗 临床疗效 狭窄程度
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.46