检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周长军[1] 田中艳[1] 吴耀坤[1] 于吉东[1] 马兰[1] 李建英[1] 刘冰[1] 李肖白[1] ZHOU Chang-jun;TIAN Zhong-yan;WU Yao-kun;YU Ji-dong;MA Lan;LI Jian-ying;LIU Bing;LI Xiao-bai(Daqing Branch,Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Daqing Comprehensive Experimental Station of National Soybean Industry Technology System,Daqing 163316,China)
机构地区:[1]黑龙江省农业科学院大庆分院/国家大豆产业技术体系大庆综合试验站,黑龙江大庆163316
出 处:《黑龙江农业科学》2022年第6期1-5,共5页Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences
基 金:黑龙江省农业科学院“农业科技创新跨越工程”专项(HNK2019CX01);国家大豆产业技术体系大庆综合试验站项目(CARS-004-CES07);黑龙江省百千万工程科技重大专项(2019ZX16B01);黑龙江省农业科学院青年基金项目(2017ZC17)。
摘 要:为探究抗线虫大豆品种(系)在不同生态环境的产量表现规律及综合性状表现,并对其作出客观合理的综合性评价,本研究采用AMMI模型分析10个抗线虫大豆品种(系)在2015-2016年5点试验数据中的品种基因型与环境互作情况,用DTOPSIS法分析品种综合性状,观察不同品种(系)的表现。结果表明:AMMI模型参数分析试验数据得出,品种G1、G3稳定性参数D_(i)值较小,说明其遗传稳定性好,品种G4、G7、G8稳定性参数D_(i)值较大,稳定性差。DTOPSIS法分析各品种综合性状数据得出,品种G1与理想品种综合性状值的相对接近度C_(i)值为0.6123(2015年)和0.7020(2016年),在参试品种综合性状分析中排在第1位,G2排名3~8位,G3排名1~4位,G8排名2~9位,G9排名8~10位。综上,结合品种田间产量表现,AMMI模型分析品种与地点互作效应,DTOPSIS法分析品种综合性状优势得出,G1、G3是可参加黑龙江省区域试验的高产稳产型品种;G2为适应特殊生态环境的高产型品种;G6是可利用回交改良其产量的性状型品种;G8是抗倒性及抗病性突出的亲本材料型品种;G9是低产的淘汰型品种。In order to explore the yield performance law and comprehensive character performance of nematode resistant soybean varieties in different ecological environment,and make an objective and reasonable comprehensive evaluation,this paper used AMMI model and DTOPSIS method to comprehensively analyze the data of five pilot trials of 10 nematode resistant soybean varieties from 2015 to 2016.AMMI model parameter analysis test data showed that the stability parameter D_(i) value of G1 and G3 was small,which indicated that their genetic stability was good,while the stability parameter D_(i) value of G4,G7 and G8 was large,and the stability was poor.DTOPSIS analysis of the comprehensive character data of each variety showed that the relative closeness C_(i) value of comprehensive character value of G1 and ideal variety was 0.6123(2015)and 0.7020(2016),G1 ranked first in the comprehensive character analysis of tested varieties,G2 ranked 3-8,G3 ranked 1-4,G8 ranked 2-9,and G9 ranked 8-10.In conclusion,combined with the field yield performance of varieties,AMMI model was used to analyze the interaction effect between varieties and locations,and DTOPSIS method was used to analyze the comprehensive character advantages of varieties.The results showed that G1 and G3 were high and stable yield varieties that could participate in the provincial regional test;G2 was high yield variety that could adapt to the special ecological environment;G6 was the variety that could use backcross to improve its yield character;G8 was the parent material variety with outstanding lodging resistance and disease resistance;and G9 was a low and stable yield eliminated variety.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.97