检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:鲁竑序阳 万勇[1] Lu Hongxuyang;Wan Yong
出 处:《学海》2022年第3期173-182,共10页Academia Bimestris
基 金:国家社科基金重大项目“健全以公平为原则的产权保护制度研究”(项目号:20ZDA049)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:近年来,世界主要法域纷纷尝试修正知识产权领域互联网中介商的侵权规则。一方面,中国在电子商务领域与欧盟在版权领域的修正路径一定程度上展现了从事后责任到事前规制的发展趋向;另一方面,不同国家对侵权规则的发展具有差异化的需求。这主要取决于互联网中介商对用户行为监管能力的提升以及不同国家互联网产业的发展状况和发展战略。中国应当立足自身需求,以公平协调各方利益、对互联网中介商进行类型化规制为思路,继续推动知识产权领域互联网中介商侵权规则的体系化,积极探索网络著作权保护的多元主体协作模式,完善《电子商务法》中的知识产权保护规则和“通知-必要措施”规则。In recent years,major jurisdictions in the world have tried to amend the liability regime of internet intermediary in intellectual property.On the one hand,the revision path of China in the field of e-commerce and the EU in the field of copyright shows the development trend from post liability to ex ante responsibility to a certain extent;On the other hand,different countries show different development needs of the liability regime.This mainly depends on the improvement of the ability of internet intermediary to supervise user’s behavior and the development status and strategy of internet industry in different countries.Based on the own needs,China should follow the idea of fair coordination of the interests of different stakeholders and regulating internet intermediary by types.China should also continue to promote the systematization of the liability regime of internet intermediaries in the field of intellectual property,actively explore the multi-agent cooperation mode of online copyright protection,and to improve the intellectual property protection rules and the“notice-and-necessary measures”rules in the E-Commerce Law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229