体育生态化的三重释读及其学科归属  

Three Different Concepts and Corresponding Subjects on Sports Ecologicalization

作　　者：黄爱宝 HUANG Aibao(Research Center of Ecological Governance Innovation,Nanjing Tech University,Nanjing 211816,China)

机构地区：[1]南京工业大学生态治理创新研究中心,江苏南京211816

出　　处：《南京体育学院学报》2022年第5期14-19,80,共7页Journal of Nanjing Sports Institute

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目“生态文明制度执行力的强化与评估研究”(20AZZ010);江苏省2020年度全省高校思政课教育教学改革创新示范点项目《以特色校园文化为基础的高校思政课教育教学改革》阶段性成果。

摘　　要：近30多年来,在我国有关体育生态化研究中,基于其中“生态化”的不同释读和定义,已经在事实上诞生和包含了自然体育(学)、生态体育(学)以及体育生态学3个不同的概念及其学科。其中,自然体育学是以生态自然属性与亲近自然观设定体育,生态体育学是以生态自然科学与环境保护观诉诸体育,而体育生态学是以生态理论方法与生态和谐观描述体育。三者在研究对象、实践目标和学科属性等方面既有区别也有联系,不能因为它们之间存在密切联系,就否定它们存在和发展的各自依据和独特价值,并消解它们学科归属的明显异质性,故三者之间不应简单地加以相互等同、相互包含或相互取代。Over the recent 30 years,during sports ecologicalization related research in China,three different concepts and corresponding subjects are created and included based on the different interpretations and definitions of“Ecology”,which are Natural Sports(science),Ecological sports(science),Sports ecology. Natural Sports science defines sports with ecological natural attributes and close to nature view,Ecological sports science resorts to sports with ecological natural science and environmental protection view,and sports ecology describes sports with ecological theory method and ecological harmony view. There are differences and connections at research objects,practice goals and subject attributions between the three,the independent foundation and unique value of their existence and development cannot be denied,the heterogeneity between their subject attributions cannot be erased due to the close connection the three. Therefore,the three cannot be simplified by describing as mutual equity,mutual inclusion or substitutions.

关 键 词：体育生态化 自然体育学 生态体育学 体育生态学 

分 类 号：G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]