风险治理中的常民知识生产、传播及影响——基于我国内陆核电争议中反核群体的研究  

The Production, Communication, and Impacts of Layperson Knowledge in Risk Governance: A Study on the Anti-Nuclear Power Activists in China

作　　者：邓理峰[1] Lifeng Deng(The School of Communication and Design,Sun Yat-sen University)

机构地区：[1]中山大学传播与设计学院

出　　处：《全球传媒学刊》2022年第2期37-59,共23页Global Journal of Media Studies

基　　金：国家社会科学基金后期资助项目“深度媒介化环境里的核电风险沟通与协商治理研究”(项目批准号:20FXWB005)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：被视为外行的普通民众,如何有序有效地参与具有知识垄断特征的公共讨论和决策,这一话题的实证研究至今仍颇为缺乏。福岛事故后,我国内陆核电争议中反核群体呈现出来的常民知识,是一种以实践理性为中心的知识体系,具有淡化科技理性、凸显社会理性和价值理性的特征。其知识来源是技术精英的核电异议,而传播和影响链则以互联网为主导,兼用政策内参和社交网络。反核常民知识最主要的影响是形塑了公众及决策者的认知结构、情感倾向和政策偏好。常民知识与专家知识在内容上是互补而非竞争的两类知识体系,可以把常民与专家之间基于知识的共识协商作为公众参与协商治理实践的一种策略和方法。How could the lay citizens engage substantially and orderly in the public discussion and decision-making process, which usually are complex technically and with high barriers of knowledge? This is a research field lacking of empirical studies. This study tries to narrow down this knowledge gap by exploring into the layperson knowledge production among anti-nuclear power activists, and its social and political impacts in China. It finds that layperson knowledge of anti-nuclear activists is systemic knowledge centered on practical rationality, emphasizing social rationality and value rationality while circumventing scientific rationality. Its source mainly come from the nuclear dissent of the tech elite. It was disseminated through Internet, internal policy report, and social media, contingent on different social walks. The social impacts of layperson knowledge include shaping the public and decision makes cognitive structure, emotional connection, and policy preference. Seeing that there is no competitive but complement relationship between layperson and expert knowledge, this study proposes that consensus deliberation basing on knowledge could be a strategy and method for lay publics engaging in deliberative governance.

关 键 词：风险治理 常民知识 内陆核电争议 福岛核事故 

分 类 号：G206[文化科学—传播学] D035[政治法律—政治学] D034.5