检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:冯倬琳[1] 郭鑫[1] 肖港 Feng Zhuolin;Guo Xin;Xiao Gang
出 处:《江苏高教》2022年第6期37-44,共8页Jiangsu Higher Education
基 金:上海市哲学社会科学规划一般课题“‘双一流’大学建设新文科品牌:国际影响力的测评分析与案例研究”(2021BGL011)。
摘 要:提升世界一流大学同行间的影响力对于中国“双一流”建设来说具有重要意义,而当前大学影响力评价面临工具窄化的问题,无法实现覆盖广泛领域的测评。研究聚焦于科研学术的“引用”逻辑,并尝试囊括更全面的评价对象和评价内容,因此构建了具有权威性、受众性和动态性的数据平台,对中国一流大学在世界一流大学中的影响力进行定量测评。测评后发现中国一流大学与世界一流大学的整体差距在逐步缩小,但与世界顶尖大学差距显著,并且自身内部的层级差异明显。大学影响力的效应规律和研究路径是未来研究可以进一步深化的方向。It is of great significance for Chinese"Double First-Class"initiative to enhance the peer influence among world-class universities.However,the current evaluation of university influence is faced with the problem of narrowing tools,which can’t cover a wide range of fields.This study focuses on the"citation"logic in scientific research,and attempts to include more comprehensive evaluation objects and contents.Therefore,a data platform considering authority,audience and dynamics is constructed,through which we quantitatively evaluate the influence of China’s first-class universities among world-class universities.The evaluation results show the overall gap between China’s first-class universities and world-class universities is gradually narrowing,but the gap with the world’s top universities is huge,and the level difference within itself is obvious.Based on this study,the effect laws and research path of university influence are research fields that can be further deepened in the future.
分 类 号:G647[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.149.30