检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陆江源 盛雯雯 宋立义 Lu Jiangyuan;Sheng Wenwen;Song Liyi
机构地区:[1]中国宏观经济研究院
出 处:《经济研究参考》2022年第6期32-46,共15页Review of Economic Research
摘 要:地方政府隐性债务与金融体系紧密相连,因此在处置地方政府隐性债务的过程中,如果处置不当或者操之过急,很可能引发“处置风险的风险”,并与其他金融风险结合,造成新的更大的系统性风险。隐性债务风险与处置风险的风险,这两种风险都是源于地方政府的信用不足,且都将造成较大的金融体系震荡,但隐性债务风险时滞长、分布散、冲击弱,而衍生风险则更加迅速、传播快且冲击性强。总体来看,隐性债务风险引发系统性金融风险的可能性极低,但隐性债务带来的风险是长期隐蔽、侵蚀性的,将对经济造成长期不利影响。The implicit debt of local governments relates closely to the financial system. Therefore, in the process of disposing local governments’ implicit debt, if the disposal is improper or too hasty, it is likely to cause "risk of disposing risk", creating new systemic risk combined with other financial risks.Implicit debt risk and "risk of disposing risk" are both caused by the lack of credit of local governments, and they will cause major financial system shocks.Implicit debt risk is long time-lagged, scattered distribution, and weak shock to the financial system, while "risk of disposing risk" spreads faster and has stronger shock to the financial system.Overall, the possibility of implicit debt risk causing systemic financial risks is very low, but the risk brought by implicit debts is long-term hidden and erosive, and may have long-term adverse effects on the economy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49