韩国奎章阁本《书义》性质与作者再考  

Reexamining the Nature and the Author of Shu Yi in Korean Kyujanggak

作　　者：朱岩[1] Zhu Yan(College of Literature,Yangzhou University)

机构地区：[1]扬州大学文学院,江苏扬州225002

出　　处：《图书馆杂志》2022年第5期128-135,共8页Library Journal

摘　　要：现存韩国奎章阁的朝鲜王朝《书》学文献《书义》抄本,其本旨虽然是为了应对朝鲜科举中的“经义”考试,但具有独特的学术价值:第一,体现出朝鲜《尚书》学的“性理化”特征;第二,较全面地展示出朝鲜王朝的政治伦理;第三,丰富与拓展了《书集传》的义理阐发。《书义》的作者题为朝鲜大儒丁若镛,但学界一般认为并非如此。根据《书义》一书的性质以及丁若镛本人的治《书》经历分析,目前学界判断《书义》是伪作的理据存在若干问题,《书义》的作者应该是与丁若镛一样曾经在成均馆读书以备“大科”考试的生员。The manuscript of Shu Yi,the literature of Shu in Li dynasty of Korea,is now preserved in Korean Kyujanggak.Although it aimed originally at preparing for exams of Confucian classics commentaries in imperial civil examinations,it still presents a distinctive academic significance.First,it shows the rationalization in Korean researches on Shang Shu.Second,it demonstrates comprehensively the political ethics of Korean dynasty.Third,it enriches and enhances the commentaries of Shu Ji Zhuan.Besides,the author of Shu Yi is inscribed as Ding Ruoyong.However,the academia generally takes it as a pseudograph.According to the analysis of the nature of Shu Yi and Ding Ruoyong’s experience in studying Shu,there are some problems in the academic circles’ justification for judging Shu Yi as a fake.The author of Shu Yi should be some student who studied at Sungkyunkwan for the great exams,just like Ding Ruoyong.

关 键 词：丁若镛 《书义》 伪作 

分 类 号：G256[文化科学—图书馆学] K221.04[历史地理—历史学]