故事、话语和叙事语义语法考辩  

On the Semantic and Grammatical Interpretations of Story,Discourse and Narrative

作　　者：周文娟[1] ZHOU Wen-juan(Colleges of Foreign Languages,Inner Mongolia University of Technology,Hohhot 010080,China)

机构地区：[1]内蒙古工业大学外国语学院,呼和浩特010080

出　　处：《北京科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第3期272-280,共9页Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：2020年度自治区留学人员回区创新启动类项目“生态语言学概论”、内蒙古工业大学外国语言学及应用语言学学科团队培育学科团队(长期建设学科方向)(编号:PY202059)。

摘　　要：通过对故事、话语和叙事三个交叠性概念在语义和语法两个方面的考辩,发现三者在基本内涵、相互关系、基本假定、分析模式和对应类型五个方面不尽相同。这一考辩涉及以下四组术语:(1)故事、话语和叙事;(2)叙事话语、故事叙事和叙事故事;(3)生态故事、生态话语和生态叙事;(4)故事语法、叙事语法、功能语法和生态语法。四组术语在分析模式和对应类型上存在显著差异性,反映了叙事学和语言学等领域的生态转向。这一考辩可以为生态语言学与生态叙事学的融合提供新思路,可以为超学科生态语言学的连接性知识建立新框架,最终为生态叙事分析模式的构建提供新依据。Three overlapping concepts of story, discourse and narrative can find themselves different in five aspects of basic denotations, mutual relationships, basic assumptions, analysis models, and corresponding types, by examining the semantic and grammatical aspects of those three terms. Such interpretations involve four sets of terms:(1) story, discourse and narrative;(2) narrative discourse, story narrative and narrative story;(3) ecological story, ecological discourse and ecological narrative;(4) story grammar, narrative grammar, functional grammar, and ecological grammar. Those four sets of terms strikingly differ in their corresponding analysis models and corresponding types, reflecting the ecological turn in the fields of narratology and linguistics. Those findings can provide new ideas for integrating ecolinguistics and ecological narratology, and establishing a new framework for the connective knowledge of transdisciplinary ecolinguistics, and providing a new basis for constructing ecological narrative analysis model.

关 键 词：故事 话语 叙事 生态转向 超学科生态语言学 生态叙事分析模式 

分 类 号：H0-05[语言文字—语言学]