国内甲骨文数据库的比较研究  

Comparative Research on Domestic Oracle Databases

作　　者：张芳 赵娜 Zhang Fang;Zhao Na(National Museum of Chinese Writing,Anyang,Henan 455000,China)

机构地区：[1]中国文字博物馆,河南安阳455000

出　　处：《漯河职业技术学院学报》2022年第2期12-19,共8页Journal of Luohe Vocational Technical College

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大委托项目(子课题)“甲骨文已识字、有争论字和未识字综理表”(16@ZH017A10);河南省哲学社会科学规划项目“汉字文化传播方式创新研究”(2017BXW010)。

摘　　要：如何构建一个完整的文字学数据库,推进汉字文化的科学研究和传播已经成为一项重要课题。我国开展甲骨文信息化处理的研究已30余年,建设了一批有代表性的数据库,对推进甲骨文字研究发挥了重要作用。选取国内6种代表性甲骨文数据库作为研究对象,分别从收录数据类型、产品类型、收录资源数量、更新情况、使用成本、移动端使用情况进行比较,从检索方式、检索字段、检索结果对6种数据库的检索功能进行分析,总结目前甲骨文数据库的整体建设情况,并就进一步开展甲骨文数据库的建设提出建议。How to construct a complete philology database and promote the scientific research and dissemination of Chinese characters culture has become an important topic at present.It has been more than 30 years since the study of information processing of oracle bone scripts was carried out in China and a number of representative databases have been built,which have played an important role in promoting the study of oracle bone scripts.By taking six kinds of typical oracle databases as the research object,this paper compares their basic conditions and search functions respectively from the data type,the product type,the number of resources included,updates,the cost to use and the use of mobile terminal and in three aspects of retrieval ways,retrieval fields and retrieval results.Then the paper summarizes the overall construction of oracle databases and puts forward some suggestions for further construction of oracle databases.

关 键 词：甲骨文数据库 数据库比较 检索功能 

分 类 号：G260[历史地理—考古学及博物馆学]