检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郝婧 危红媛 银增辉 景晓军[1] 吴春玲[1] HAO Jing;WEI Hongyuan;YIN Zenghui;JING Xiaojun;WU Chunling(China Automotive Technology and Research Center Co.,Ltd.,Tianjin 300300,China)
机构地区:[1]中国汽车技术研究中心有限公司,天津300300
出 处:《交通节能与环保》2022年第3期28-33,共6页Transport Energy Conservation & Environmental Protection
摘 要:本文综述了国内外燃油添加剂性能的评价方法,主要包括汽油添加剂和柴油添加剂,并比较了不同评价方法之间的差异,得出国内外的燃油添加剂评价方法均以考察其积碳清除和抑制效果的清净性为主,缺乏实际节能减排效果的评价方法,建议加快制定燃油清净增效剂节能减排效果评价的国家标准,以加强我国燃油清净增效剂产品的研发和管理,助力我国碳达峰、碳中和目标的实现。This article reviews the performance evaluation methods of fuel additives at home and abroad,mainly including gasoline additives and diesel additives,and compares the differences between different evaluation methods. It is concluded that the evaluation methods of fuel additives at home and abroad are mainly to evaluate their carbon deposition removal and inhibition effects,and lack of the evaluation of their actual energy conservation and emission reduction effect. It is recommended to accelerate the formulation of national standards about the evaluation the energy-saving and emission reduction effects of fuel detergent synergists,so as to strengthen the R&D and management of fuel detergent synergists in China,and help our country achieve the goals of carbon peak and carbon neutralization.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147