从收入不平等走向共同富裕——中国城乡户籍“非制度性歧视”的分解与弥合  

From Income Inequality to Common Prosperity——Decomposition and Consolidation of China’s Urban and Rural Registered Residence“Non Institutional Discrimination”

作　　者：梁盛凯 陈池波[1] LIANG Sheng-kai;CHEN Chi-bo(School of Business Administration,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430007,China)

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学工商管理学院,湖北武汉430007

出　　处：《山西财经大学学报》2022年第3期1-15,共15页Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目(15AJY014)。

摘　　要：利用中国流动人口动态监测数据(CMDS2017),系统研究了城镇劳动力市场中存在的农村户籍劳动力“非制度性歧视”问题以及市场均衡机制。研究发现:城镇劳动力市场中的公有和私有制部门均普遍存在对农村户籍劳动者的“非制度性歧视”,工资差异约有52.16%来自于“非制度性歧视”“;非制度性歧视”在均衡处存在的重要前提是用工主体利用异质性雇佣关系实现对劳动力的筛选以及对劳动力市场的隐性分割,进而通过人力资本积累的“增长效应”加速推动城镇户籍劳动者的相对劳动价格向更高水平收敛,导致“非制度性歧视”随时间变化逐渐内化为特征差异,成为城乡收入分配不平等长期存在的重要原因。Based on the data from China Migrants Dynamics Survey in 2017(CMDS2017),the paper systematically studied the problem of“non-institutional discrimination”on rural registered labor force and market balance mechanism in urban labor market.The results showed that,there was widespread“non-institutional discrimination”against rural registered labor force in both public sectors and private sectors in urban labor market.And about 52.16%causes of wage differences were from“non-institutional discrimination”.The important premise of the existence of“non-institutional discrimination”in equilibrium was that accepting entities have completed workforce screening and the implicit segmentation of labor market through heterogeneous employment relations,and then acceleratively pushed the relative labor price of urban household registration workers converging to a higher level through the“growth effects”of human capital accumulation,which may make“non-institutional discrimination”turn into characteristic differences along with time changed and finally become an important reason for the long-term existence of urban-rural income distribution inequality.

关 键 词：户籍制度 工资歧视 收入不平等 农民工 共同富裕 

分 类 号：F126[经济管理—世界经济]