检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:金相廷 张幸 黄俊 尚艳强 JIN Xiang-ting;ZHANG Xing;HUANG Jun(Department of traumatic orthopedics,the first Naval hospital of southern theater command,Zhanjiang,Guangdong 524009)
机构地区:[1]南部战区海军第一医院创伤骨科,广东湛江524009
出 处:《中国伤残医学》2022年第10期24-28,共5页Chinese Journal of Trauma and Disability Medicine
摘 要:目的::对经肱三头肌两侧入路行双锁定钢板内固定治疗肱骨远端骨折的临床效果进行分析评价。方法:选取2018年6月1日-2020年6月12日我院20例肱骨远端骨折患者,随机分为2组,每组10例。观察组采用肘后切口肱三头肌两侧入路双锁定钢板内固定手术治疗,对照组采用肘后切口尺骨鹰嘴截骨双锁定钢板内固定手术治疗。分析术后患者肢体功能恢复情况及患者主观评价情况。结果:经过手术治疗后,20例患者的肢体运动功能均得到恢复,骨折愈合情况良好,其中观察组手术时间短于对照组,2组患者骨折愈合情况及功能恢复情况无明显统计学差异(P>0.05),但患者评价情况观察组优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:2种手术方式治疗肱骨远端C型骨折效果相当,与截骨手术比较患者更易接受肱三头肌两侧入路手术方式。Objective:To investigated the clinical effect of internal fixation with double locking plates by triceps bilateral approach in the treatment of distal humerus fracture.Methods:Twenty patients with type C distal humerus fracture in our hospital were randomly divided into two groups,group A(n=10)and group B(n=10).In Group A,patients were treated with double locking plates internal fixation via bilateral triceps approach.In group B,patients were treated with double locking plates internal fixation by olecranon osteotomy.The recovery of limb function and subjective evaluation of patients were analyzed.Results:The operation time of group A was shorter than group B(P<0.05),and there was no significant statistical difference in fracture healing and functional recovery between the two groups(P>0.05).The patients subjective evaluation of group A was significantly positive than group B(P<0.05).Conclusions:The results of the two operations for type C distal humerus fracture are comparable,and patients are more likely to accept triceps bilateral approach than osteotomy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117