检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐伟超 竺小缘 陈赞 于湧潮 陈隽韡 XU Wei-chao;ZHU Xiao-yuan;CHEN Zan;YU Yong-chao;CHEN Jun-wei(Shanghai Business School,201400,Shanghai,China)
机构地区:[1]上海商学院,上海201400
出 处:《特区经济》2022年第5期25-29,共5页Special Zone Economy
摘 要:个人信息保护是大数据背景下立法论研究中必不可少的部分之一,而在大数据背景下,个人信息具有易收集性、便捷性、高重复利用性、易泄露性等特点,使个人信息保护难度增加。本文在介绍我国国内信息保护法律规范的同时,基于比较方法研究以德国、日本为例的大陆法系的具体法律规范以及以英国、美国为例的普通法系国家的个人信息保护立法实践的比较为切入点,分析大数据时代不同国家信息保护的方式与特点。通过对上述四国两法系的信息保护的优势与不足进行比较,对我国个人信息保护法律规范的可能发展方向加以了探讨。Personal information protection is one of the essential parts of legislation research under the background of big data. In the background of big data, personal information is easy to collect, convenient,high reuse, easy to leak and so on, which makes it more difficult to protect personal information. In this paper, through the introduction of domestic information protection laws in our country at the same time, based on the comparative method studies in Germany and Japan, for example the specific legal norms the continental law system and in Britain, the United States, for example in the common law countries the comparison of personal information protection legislation practice as the breakthrough point, analysis of big data era information protection the ways and features of different countries. By comparing the advantages and disadvantages of information protection in the above-mentioned four countries and two legal systems, this paper discusses the possible development direction of the legal norms of China’s personal information protection law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222